Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

11-2686 - Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Time Warner Cable Inc. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
11-2686 - Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Time Warner Cable Inc. et al
January 22, 2013
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 39 defendants' Motion to Transfer Case; and denying as moot 49 defendants' Motion to Sever and Stay. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 1/18/2013. (mss)
December 16, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER granting 68 motion for leave to file an amended complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 12/16/2013. (ah)
October 9, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - It is ordered that certain terms in the patents at issue in this action are construed as set forth herein.Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 10/09/2014. (ses)
November 14, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER memorializing rulings made during November 14, 2014 status conference regarding representation of Craig Cowden. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 11/14/2014. (ah)
October 6, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 171 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 10/06/2015. (ses)
October 6, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 125 Time Warner Cable's Motion Confirm That TWC's Equitable Defenses Have Been Adequately Pled, Or, In the Alternative, to Amend Answer. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 10/06/2015. (ses)
October 8, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: It is ordered that defendants' motion to stay (Doc. # 846, filed in Case No. 11-2684) is hereby granted, and Case Nos. 11-2685 and 11-2686 are hereby stayed, with the trial settings and all deadlines vacated, until further order of the Court. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 10/08/2015. (ses)
December 5, 2016
PDF | More
d exhaustion. The motion is denied with respect to Sprint's claim of infringement of the '932 Patent and TWC's defenses of equitable estoppel, acquiescence, and waiver. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT defendants' joint motion for summary judgment with respect to the issues of collateral estoppel and invalidity (Doc. #870 in Case No. 11-2684; 130 in Case No. 11-2686) is denied.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Comcast's motion for summary judgment ( Doc. #880 in Case No. 11-2684) is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted with respect to non-infringement of the '918 Patent. The motion is denied with respect to non-infringement of the '3,561 Patent and the '6,561 Patent, equitable estoppel, and laches. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT TWC's motion for summary judgment with respect to non-infringement of the '3,561 Patent and the '6,561 Patent, equitable estoppel, and laches (140 in Case No. 11-2686) is denied. Signed by DistriMEMORANDUM AND ORDER It is ordered Sprint's motion for summary judgment in its case against Comcast (Doc. #884 in Case No. 11-2684) is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted with respect to Sprint's claim of infringement of the '932 Patent as it relates to Comcast's accused systems other than those using the Cedar Point architecture. The motion is denied with respect to Comcast's defenses of equitable estoppel and implied license. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT Sprint's motion for summary judgment in its case against TWC (146 in Case No. 11-2686) is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted with respect to TWC's defenses of express license, implied license, anct Judge John W. Lungstrum on 12/05/2016. (ses)
December 5, 2016
PDF | More
ngstrum on 12/05/2016. (ses)MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT Sprint's motion to exclude testimony by TWC expert Putnam (Doc. # 159 in Case No. 11-2686) is granted in part and denied in part, as more fully set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT Sprint's motion to exclude testimony by Comcast expert Davis (Doc. # 893 in Case No. 11-2684) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Sprint's motion to exclude testimony by defense expert Houh, filed in both cases (Doc. # 867 in Case No. 11-2684; Doc. # 137 in Case No. 11-2686), is denied.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Sprint's motion to exclude testimony by Comcast expert Min (Doc. # 896 in Case No. 11-2684) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT defendants' separate motions to exclude testimony by Sprint expert Rao (Doc. # 872 in Case No. 11-2684; Doc. # 134 in Case No. 11-2686) are granted in part and denied in part, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by District Judge John W. Lu
December 6, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER granting 239 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 12/06/2016. (srj)
March 14, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT plaintiff's claim for enhanced damages is hereby denied, and defendants are awarded judgment on that claim. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT defendants' motions (Doc. ## 381, 438, 443), to strike evidence and related argument concerning Time Warner Cable's equitable defenses are granted in part as set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law on their equitable defenses pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50 (Doc. # 431) is hereby denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT plaintiff's motion for judgment on defendants' equitable defenses at the close of defendants' case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(c) (Doc. # 436) is hereby denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT defendants' motion to strike portions of plaintiff's oral argument concerning enhanced damages (Doc. # 444) is denied as moot. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 03/14/2017. (ses)
May 30, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - It is ordered that defendants' posttrial motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b) or for a new trial 485 is denied. It is further ordered that plaintiff's motion for an amendment of the judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59, to add an award of prejudgment interest 483 is hereby granted in part. The Court awards prejudgment interest to plaintiff in the amount of $6,183,548.00, and the Court will issue an amended judgment accordingly. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 05/30/2017. (ses)