Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

18-2012 - Donahue v. Kansas Board of Education et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
18-2012 - Donahue v. Kansas Board of Education et al
March 6, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER denying 30 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Plaintiff is hereby informed that, within 14 days after she is served with a copy of this order, she may, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 and D. Kan. Rule 72.1.4(a), file written objections to this order by filing a motion requesting that the presiding U.S. district judge review this order. A party must file any objections within the 14-day period if the party wants to have appellate review of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 3/6/2018. Mailed to pro se party Lloyd Swartz by regular mail. (ydm)
March 19, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER granting 24 motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, denying as moot 28 motion for partial reconsideration of the court's March 2, 2018 order. See order for details and deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 3/19/2018. Mailed to pro se party Lloyd Swartz by regular mail. (amh)
June 20, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER overruling 32 Motion to Review Magistrate Order; granting 33 Motion to Dismiss Party Elena Lincoln; denying as moot 36 Defendant's Elena Lincoln's Motion to Stay Case; granting 49 Motion to Dismiss Parties Kansas Board of Education, Randy Watson, Mark Ward and Scott Gordon; denying 62 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Permanent Order of Protection ; denying in part and granting in part 64 Motion to Dismiss. The only claim remaining is the request for the judicial review of the due process hearing and subsequent administrative review; granting 66 Motion to Dismiss defendants John Allison and Deborah Chappell. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff is ordered to show cause why the court should not dismiss defendant Lloyd Swartz as an improper party within fourteen days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. If plaintiff is unable to demonstrate a legal basis for keeping defendant Lloyd Swartz in this case for judicial review, the court will dismiss defendant from the case. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 6/20/2018. Mailed to pro se party Toni Donahue by certified mail ; Certified Tracking Number: 70171000000006997218. (ydm)
August 1, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 85 Motion to Stay Case; denying 88 Motion Requesting Permission to File Interlocutory Appeal. The court has denied plaintiff's motion to stay, plaintiff is once again ordered to show cause why the court should not dismiss defendant Lloyd Swartz as an improper party within fourteen days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. If plaintiff is unable to demonstrate a legal basis for keeping defendant Swartz in this case for judicial review, the court will dismiss defendant Swartz from the case. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 8/1/2018. Mailed to pro se party Toni Donahue by regular mail and certified mail; certified # 70180680000181740014. (ydm)
August 27, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against defendant Lloyd Swartz are dismissed, and he is terminated as a party to this action. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 8/27/2018. Mailed to pro se parties Toni R Donahue and Lioyd Swartz by regular mail. (ydm)
October 24, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 101 Motion for Reconsideration and Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 10/24/2018. (ydm)