Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

03-3451 - Smith v. Phaam, et al.

Download Files


Document in Context
03-3451 - Smith v. Phaam, et al.
March 5, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER denying 57 Motion to Compel; denying 58 Motion to Certify Class; denying 58 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 59 Motion for Order; denying 60 Motion for Sanctions; denying 61 Motion to Compel; denying 72 Motion to Strike; denying 73 Motion to Strike; denying 74 Motion to Appoint Counsel; granting 75 Motion to Supplement. The clerk's office shall attach plaintiff's Motion to Supplement (Doc. 75) as a supplement to Exhibit A to plaintiff's response (Doc. 69) to defendant Sanders' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 56). Defendant Sharp shall file a responsive pleading within eleven (11) days of this order. Pursuant to Fed. Rul Civ. P. 4(d) the clerk of the court shall reissue summons to defendant Phaam. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 3/5/2008. (ars)
June 17, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED, that plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment 80 should be denied. Copies of this recommendation and report shall be mailed either electronically or via the United States Postal Service to the parties. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1), as set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) and D. Kan. Rule 72.134, the parties may serve and file written objections to the recommendation within 10 days after being served with a copy. Finding as moot 81 Motion to Strike; granting 82 Motion to Dismiss Surreply; denying 83 Motion for Leave to File Surreply; finding as moot 85 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply; finding as moot 90 Motion; granting 97 Motion to Continue; finding as moot 102 Motion to Strike. On or by 7/1/08, defendant Sanders shall apprise the court as to the settlement status of this matter. After such appraisal, the court will determine whether definitive deadlines pertaining to the commencement of formal discovery are appropriate. SEE TEXT OF ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius 6/16/2008.(ars)
July 10, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER ENTERED: The Report and Recommendation 104 of Magistrate Judge Sebelius is adopted in full by the court. Plaintiff's motion 80 for default judgment against defendant Sharp is denied. The motion 94 of defendant Pham for his dismissal and the motion 96 of plaintiff to dismiss defendant Pham are granted. The alternative motion 94 of defendant Pham for a more definite statement is denied as moot. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 07/10/08. (smnd)
July 28, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER denying 106 Motion to Compel. SEE TEXT OF ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 7/28/2008.(ars)