Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

04-4157 - Quality Trust, Inc. v. Cajun Contractors, Inc. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
04-4157 - Quality Trust, Inc. v. Cajun Contractors, Inc. et al
March 31, 2005
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 7 Motion of defendants' to Dismiss or transfer. See attached for more details.Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 3/31/05. (bmw )
March 21, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER denying 59 Motion for Reconsideration. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 3/21/2006. (djs)
March 21, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion to Stay Proceedings and Extend Discovery. See order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 3/21/2006. (djs)
June 27, 2006
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Based upon the review of the record, the absence of any filed objections, the lack of prejudice to the defendant, and the fact plaintiff has now secured counsel, the court accepts the report and recommendation 75 of the U.S. Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the ruling of this court, denying defendant's 61 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 6/27/06.(bmw)
April 4, 2007
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The plaintiff QTI's motion for summary judgment 85 is denied. The defendants' motion for summary judgment 79 is denied on the following of the plaintiff's claims: the Miller Act claims for payment under the contract and, alternatively, for quantum meruit, and the common-law breach of contract claim for unnecessary and unreasonable delays and interference with performance; the motion is granted as to the plaintiff's remaining claims for relief; and the motion is granted as to the defendant Cajun's counterclaim for breach of contract and damages in the amount of $26,570.40. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 4/4/07. (bmw) Modified on 4/5/2007 (ms).
February 13, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Defendants' motion to enforce the settlement agreement 116 is granted, and the clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing this case with prejudice, as the case has been settled by the parties pursuant to the oral settlement agreement reached on 7/24/07, and the terms of which are established and evidenced in accordance with the transcript of the settlement hearing 123 and with the settlement and release agreement attached to the defendant's motion 116; the defendants' motion to strike 119 the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration 118 is granted; and the documents entitled Response to Defendants' Motion to Enforce Settlement 120 and Plaintiff's Motion to Strike 122, both of which were filed by Lawrence M. Ruiz in his pro se capacity, are also stricken pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f) for the reasons stated in the memorandum and order. 101 Motion to Exclude Testimony and Opinions is moot. See attached for more details. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 2/13/08. Copy of Memorandum Order mailed to plaintiff. (bmw)