Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

08-4025 - Lewis v. Wheeles et al

Download Files


Document in Context
08-4025 - Lewis v. Wheeles et al
July 28, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER denying 11 Motion to Amend Complaint. Because the court's decision to deny plaintiff leave to amend with respect to his assertion of individual liability against the proposed defendant officer has the identical effect of an order dismissing a potential claim or party, it can be considered to be dispositive, and plaintiff is entitled to a de novo review of that decision by the presiding judge upon the filing of a written objection in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and D. Kan. R. 72.1.4(b). In the event plaintiff wishes to exercise his right to such a de novo review, he should follow the procedures outlined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and D. Kan. R. 72.1.4(b) for filing an objection to a magistrate judges recommendation on a dispositive matter, and he must file such an objection within ten days of the entry of this order. SEE TEXT OF ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 7/28/2008.(ars)
September 29, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS re: 13 Motion to Dismiss. SEE MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 9/29/2008. (mkc)