Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-068 - Brown et al v. Kentucky Legislative Research Commission et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-068 - Brown et al v. Kentucky Legislative Research Commission et al
June 27, 2013
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) DENYING dft Greg Stumbo's 36 Motion to Stay; (2) a separate Scheduling Order shall issue directing the parties of the manner of proceeding & the expedited deadlines. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 6/27/13. (KJR)cc: COR
August 16, 2013
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Before: BOGGS, Circuit Judge; VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge; and BERTELSMAN, Senior District Judge. PER CURIAM. It is hereby ORDERED, as follows: (1) The Plaintiffs' Joint Motion for Summary Judgment 67 is GRANTED; (2) The 2002 state legislative electoral districts, which are currently in place in the Commonwealth of Kentucky, are DECLARED Unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment;(3) The Secretary of State of Kentucky and the Kentucky Board of Elections are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from administering further elections pursuant to those districts; (4) The Legislative Research Commissions Motion to Dismiss 2012 Elections Claims 68 is DENIED, as moot.This 16th day of August 2013.(CBD)cc: COR
January 27, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Before: BOGGS, Circuit Judge; VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge; and BERTELSMAN, Senior District Judge: (1) Both groups of plaintiffs in this case are entitled to reasonable attorney fees as prevailing parties; and (2) Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72, the defendants' objections regarding the reasonableness of the plaintiffs' requested attorney fees 129 & 131 are referred to the Honorable J. Gregory Wehrman, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, for his Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge may require such additional briefing and hold such evidentiary or other hearings as he deems appropriate. Dated 1/27/2014.(CBD)cc: COR