Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

17-186 - Lear v. Hitachi America, Ltd.

Download Files


Document in Context
17-186 - Lear v. Hitachi America, Ltd.
March 26, 2018
PDF | More
e to File Second Amended Complaint 46 is GRANTED; 4) Plts' Motion to Modify the Scope of the Collective Class 48 is DENIED; 5) Dft's Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply to Plts' Reply 51 is GRANTED; 6) Plts' Motion to Set Rule 16 Scheduling Conference 56 is GRANTED; 7) Dft's Motion for Leave to File Response to Plts' Supplemental Authority 63 is GRANTED; 8) w/in 21 days, Dft SHALL PRODUCE to Plts a list of all current and former employees to receive notice; 9) Parties shall meet and confer re form of notice in a good faith effort to resolve Dfts' obj and either file agreed notice or competing notices w/in 31 days; 10) No later than 21 days, parties meet to discuss nature and basis of claims and de MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Dft's Motion to Dismiss 20 is DENIED AS MOOT due to the filing of Amended Complaint; 2) Plts' Motion to Certify Class 32 is GRANTED subject to the limitations listed herein; 3) Plts' Motion for Leavfenses and possibilities of prompt resolution of case, make Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures and develop proposed discovery plan; 11) w/in 10 days after meeting, file joint status report; 12) counsel may use Form 52 as form of joint status report. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 3/26/2018.(STC)cc: COR