Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

11-132 - Amburgey et al v. United States of America et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
11-132 - Amburgey et al v. United States of America et al
September 29, 2012
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Defendant's motion to dismiss 11 GRANTED; 2) Complaint DISMISSED; 3) case STRICKEN from docket. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 9/29/2012. (SKV) cc: COR
September 29, 2012
PDF | More
JUDGMENT: 1) US Motion to Dismiss 11 GRANTED; 2) Plaintiffs' claims against all Defendants DISMISSED; 3) action DISMISSED & STRICKEN from docket; 4) Judgment is FINAL & APPEALABLE. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 9/29/2012.(SKV)cc: COR
February 29, 2016
PDF | More
OPINION AND ORDER: 1) United States' motion to limit evidence of consortium damages (DE 58) is GRANTED and any such evidence is EXCLUDED; 2) United States' motion to limit testimony of plaintiff's expert witness (DE 58) is DEFERRED until trial; and 3) plaintiff's oral motion for an advisory jury is DENIED. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 2/29/2016. (RCB)cc: COR
March 2, 2016
PDF | More
OPINION AND ORDER: This matter is before Court on plaintiff's motion in limine (DE 60). For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part, and DEFERRED in part. See Order. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 3/2/2016. (RCB)cc: COR
March 2, 2016
PDF | More
OPINION AND ORDER: This matter is before Court on parties' objections to opposing party's exhibit list. (DE 59, 61). Delma objects to Dft's Exhibit 8, "Review of Biologic Matrices (Urine, Blod, Hair) as Indicators of Recent or Ongoing Cannabis Use." This objection is SUSTAINED. United States objects to items 3, 7, 16, 17, 18, and 19 on pla's Exhibit List. The plaintiff has not responded to objections. Item 3 is the expert report of plaintiff's expert witness and Item 7 is the expert report of government's expert witness. The government argues that neither report should be introduced on direct but instead can only be introduced for impeachment purposes. This objection is SUSTAINED. Items 16, 17, 18, and 19 are affidavits of lay witnesses. This objection is also SUSTAINED. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 3/2/2016. (RCB)cc: COR