Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-5566 - Murphy et al v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-5566 - Murphy et al v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al
June 7, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER and REASONS denying 7 Motion to Remand to State Court, as stated within document. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 6/7/2016. (cbs)
June 16, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER and REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Honeywell's motion to dismiss (Rec. Doc. 4) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to its right to re-file the motion following Plaintiff's amendment. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Honeywell's foregoing motion to continue (Rec. Doc. 41) is DENIED as MOOT, as stated within document. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 6/16/2016. (cbs)
February 16, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER and REASONS denying 58, 76 Motions to Dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs are to file a Fourth Amended Complaint, no later than fifteen (15) days from entry of this Order and Reasons, providing a more detailed explanation of the specific factual bases for their claims against Defendants to this action. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that responsive pleadings to the Fourth Amended Complaint are to be filed no later than fifteen (15) days from the filing date of the Fourth Amended Complaint, as stated within document. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 2/16/2017. (cbs)