Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-13773 - Legeaux et al v. Borg-Warner Corporation et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-13773 - Legeaux et al v. Borg-Warner Corporation et al
October 17, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER AND REASONS denying 37 Motion for Leave to File First Supplemental and Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 10/14/16. (clc)
October 24, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER AND REASONS re 40 Motion to Remand - IT IS ORDERED that the motion to remand is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than October 31, 2016, plaintiffs shall file a brief with the Court indicating whether they oppose dismissing Western Oceanic Services, Inc. If they do oppose dismissing Western Oceanic, then plaintiffs shallciting appropriate case lawexplain (1) how it is permissible to maintain Western Oceanic as a defendant in spite of Del. Code tit. 8, ยง 278, and (2) whether a trustee must be appointed to maintain Western Oceanic as a defendant. If plaintiffs oppose dismissal, the removing defendants shall file a response by November 4, 2016. After considering the parties arguments, the Court will determine whether Western Oceanic should be dismissed. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk. (bwn)
February 8, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER granting 107 Motion for Leave to File Third Party Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 2/8/2017. (ajn)
February 9, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER AND REASONS granting 92 MOTION for Partial Dismissal; all of plaintiffs' claims against BorgWarner for pre-death loss of consortium, market share liability, enterprise liability, concert of action, punitive damages, and attorneys' fees are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 2/8/2017.(blg)