Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-9501 - Wittmann v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-9501 - Wittmann v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
April 23, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER AND REASONS re 16 Motion to Compel. Applying the foregoing standards and having considered the motion papers and the record as a whole, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as set forth in document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson, Jr on 4/23/2018. (mmv)
June 13, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER AND REASONS: ORDERED that the Wittmann's 35 Motion for review of the Magistrates Order and Reasons is DENIED in part as moot and GRANTED in part as to the identification of communications by attorneys who are not in-house counsel. FURTHER ORDERED that Unum must produce responses that adequately address Wittmann's request for oral and written communications by any lawyer that participated in Wittmann's claims by June 28, 2018. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 6/13/2018. (clc)
July 11, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER AND REASONS: Defendant's 68 Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash is GRANTED IN PART in that the subpoena is partially modified AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS ORDERED that no later than August 1, 2018, (1) Dr. Bress must produce records in response to the first paragraph of Exhibit A to plaintiff's subpoena that is modified as follows: "Produce any single record or combination of records (for example an excerpt from your annual federal income tax return) sufficient to show your total compensation for medical services of any kind, including but not limited to patient care, medical care, medical records review, expert services and consulting services for the years 2014-2017"; (2) Dr. Bress must produce records in response to paragraph two of Exhibit A to plaintiff's subpoena, which remains unmodified. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all materials produced in response to the subpoena must be marked and treated as "confidential" and are subject to all terms and conditions of the protective order already in place in this case. Record Doc. No. 34. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson, Jr on 7/11/2018. (mmv)