Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

10-10220 - USA v. Matz

Download Files


Document in Context
10-10220 - USA v. Matz
September 28, 2016
PDF | More
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered denying 34 Motion Stay Briefing re 31 MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 pursuant to Johnson v. US 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015) as to Joseph Matz (1) (Caruso, Stephanie)
April 3, 2017
PDF | More
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered In light of the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court concluding that the Sentencing Guidelines are not subject to vagueness challenges under the Due Process Clause, United States v. Beckles, No. 15-8544, slip op. at 1 (U.S. Mar. 6, 2017), defendants motion (Docket No. 31) is DENIED.Furthermore, the Supreme Courts holding indicates that defendant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 2253(c)(2). Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability.So ordered. (Caruso, Stephanie) Civil Case 1:16-cv-11250-NMG closed.