Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

10-11041 - Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. et al v. Zoll Medical Corporation


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
10-11041 - Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. et al v. Zoll Medical Corporation
November 26, 2012
PDF | More
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER(Moore, Kellyann)
March 4, 2013
PDF | More
Ch. Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered re: 137 Motion to Compel. The Motion is ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part. ZOLL shall produce information regarding the dates, parameters, and results of tests it performed on Philips's accused products, as referenced in the preliminary infringement contentions for the '526 patent, by March 14, 2013. Philips may supplement its invalidity contentions within 7 days of receiving the testing information. The deadlines for expert reports are extended to March 28, 2013 and April 18, 2013. See attached Order. (Robinson, Amy)
April 30, 2013
PDF | More
Ch. Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered re: 171 Motion for Protective Order. The Motion is DENIED. Within seven days, the parties shall confer and agree to a definite date for the relevant deposition. See attached Order. (Robinson, Amy)
November 19, 2013
PDF | More
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: "Accordingly, as previously ruled in the Order of this Court entered on November 6, 2013 (Docket No. 447): 1) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment that (1) the '187 Patent Claims are Invalid as Anticipated, or, in the Alternative, (2) Philips's Accused Products Do Not Infringe the '187 Patent (Docket No. 219) is DENIED; 2) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of the '526 Patent (Docket No. 223) is DENIED; 3) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment of No Inequitable Conduct (Docket No. 227) is DENIED; 4) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Laches (Docket No. 231) is DENIED; 5) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment that (1) No Asserted Claim is Entitled to a Priority Date Before May 10, 1994; (2) Asserted Claims 25, 41, 42, 43, 67-72 of the '374 Patent and Claims 1-7 of the '460 Patent are Invalid for Anticipation; and (3) Asserted Claims 66 and 73 are not Infringed (Docket No. 232) is DENIED; 6) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of Waveform Patents ('879, '905, '978, and '454 Patents) (Docket No. 236) is DENIED;7) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Lack of Written Description of Certain Claims of the '212 and '454 Patents (Docket No. 237) is DENIED; 8) Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Preclude ZOLL's Reliance on Documents Not Produced as Required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) (Docket No. 272) is DENIED AS MOOT; 9) The Joint Motion to Dismiss Remaining Claims with Prejudice (Docket No. 369) is ALLOWED. So ordered."(Moore, Kellyann)
May 16, 2014
PDF | More
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: "Looking to the totality of evidence presented, the Court concludes that it is inappropriate 1) to limit Philips' damages based upon the doctrine of laches or 2) to bar Philips' claims of infringement of its waveform patents based upon the doctrine of equitable estoppel. So ordered."(Moore, Kellyann)
June 20, 2014
PDF | More
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: "For the foregoing reasons, the Court concludes that it is inappropriate to bar claims of infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,749,905, 6,047,212 and 5,836,978 based upon the doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting and therefore such claims are not barred.So ordered."(Moore, Kellyann)
January 9, 2015
PDF | More
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: "For the foregoing reasons, defendant's motion to stay is ALLOWED in part, and DENIED, in part. Trial relating to damages in Civil Action No. 10-11041-NMG is stayed pending judgment in the cross-appeals to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. All issues in Civil Action No. 12-12255-NMG are ready for trial, which will commence as previously scheduled on Monday, March 2, 2015 at 9:00 A.M. So ordered." Please see order for further details. Associated Cases: 1:10-cv-11041-NMG, 1:12-cv-12255-NMG(Moore, Kellyann)
October 26, 2016
PDF | More
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered granting 861 Assented to MOTION to Seal Document Exhibit A to Philips's Assented-To Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment to Preclude ZOLL from Colleof Local Rule 7.2, motion allowed." (Caruso, Stephanie)cting Damages Before July 12, 2010, Because of Failure to Provide Notice in Compliance with 35 U.S.C. ยง 287(a) by Koninklijke Philips, N.V., Philips Electronics North America Corporation. "Subject, specifically, to the provision
October 26, 2016
PDF | More
ed Certificate Of Service "Subject, specifically, to the provision of Local Rule 7.2, motion allowed." (Caruso, Stephanie)Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered granting 864 Motion to Seal Document 863 Assented to MOTION for Leave to File Reply Brief In Support Of Its Motion For Summary Judgment Regarding Failure To Mark And Willfulness with attach
October 26, 2016
PDF | More
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered granting 879 Motion to Seal Document 878 Affidavit in Support of Motion, 877 Redacted Document "Subject, specifically, to the provision of Local Rule 7.2, motion allowed." (Caruso, Stephanie)
November 8, 2016
PDF | More
MOTION to Stay Trial Pending Reexamination with attached Certificate of Service filed by Zoll Medical Corporation.(Lima, Christine)Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, denying 892 MOTION TO SET DEADLINES FOR PHILIPS TO SEEK LEAVE TO FILE ANY AMENDED OR NEW DAMAGES EXPERT REPORTS filed by Zoll Medical Corporation, and denying 876
March 30, 2017
PDF | More
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered granting 939 Joint MOTION to Amend Stipulated Protective Order by Koninklijke Philips, N.V., Philips Electronics North America Corporation."Subject to the caveat added in page 20 of the amended protective order, motion allowed." (Caruso, Stephanie)
June 19, 2017
PDF | More
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 1) Defendants motion to exclude portions of the testimony of Mr. John C Jarosz (Docket No. 924) is DENIED and2) Defendants motion to exclude in part the testimony of Dr. John P. Freese (Docket No. 926) is DENIED.(Caruso, Stephanie)
June 26, 2017
PDF | More
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 1) defendants motion for summary judgment of no willful infringement (Docket No. 921) is ALLOWED;2) plaintiffs motion for summary judgment that defendant cannot collect damages on certain foreign sales (Docket No. 929) is DENIED and3) plaintiffs motion for summary judgment Preclude defendant from collecting damages (Docket No. 935) is, with respect to damages between June 1, 2006 and November, 16, 2006, DENIED.So ordered.(Caruso, Stephanie)
July 7, 2017
PDF | More
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered Accordingly, 1) plaintiffs assented-to motion to seal its opposition to defendants motions in limine and supporting exhibits (Docket No. 1015) is DENIED, 2) defendants assented-to motion to seal its opposition to plaintiffs motions in limine (Docket No. 1035) is DENIED and 3) defendants motion to seal Exhibit 2 to its witness and exhibit list (Docket No. 1040) is DENIED.For the reasons set forth above, the parties motions in limine (Docket Nos. 991, 992, 993, 994, 996, 999, 1000, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1008, 1009, 1010 and 1011) and supporting exhibits (Docket Nos. 1001 and 1007) are hereby UNSEALED.So ordered. (Caruso, Stephanie)