Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

12-11663 - South Shore Hellenic Church, Inc. v. Artech Church Interiors, Inc. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
12-11663 - South Shore Hellenic Church, Inc. v. Artech Church Interiors, Inc. et al
August 29, 2014
PDF | More
Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 32 MOTION to Dismiss filed by William Burns, Artech Church Interiors, Inc. This court RECOMMENDS that the motion to dismiss (Docket Entry # 32) be DENIED except with respect to the request for leave to file a third party complaint which is ALLOWED as to Cave and Jims Pro and DENIED as to Foley and Flynn. Defendants may file a third party complaint against Cave and Jims Pro in accordance with this opinion on or before September 19, 2014. This court will conduct a hearing on the motions for a protective order (Docket Entry ## 24, 25) as well as a pending motion to compel (Docket Entry # 44), a third motion for a protective order (Docket Entry # 46) and a motion to strike (Docket Entry # 48) on October 1, 2014, at 2:30 p.m. Objections to R&R due by 9/12/2014(Costa`, Susan)
February 26, 2015
PDF | More
Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ORDER entered adopting 50 Report and Recommendations.; granting in part and denying in part 32 Motion to Dismiss(Danieli, Chris)
February 19, 2016
PDF | More
Entry 91) be DENIED. The standing issue raises factual questions as to whether SSHC was the contracting party. It is also RECOMMENDED that Caves summary judgment motion (Docket Entry 92) be: (1) ALLOWED as to the implied contractual indemnity clMagistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: In accordance with the foregoing discussion, it is RECOMMENDED that defendants summary judgment motion (Docket Entry 95) and SSHCs motion for summary judgment (Docketaim in Count II of the third party complaint, the good faith and fair dealing claim in Count III of the third party complaint, the breach of contract claim brought by Burns in Count III of the third party complaint, and Burns claim in Count IV of the third party complaint; and (2) DENIED as to Count I of the third party complaint, Artechs claim in Count IV of the third party complaint, the tort-based indemnity claim in Count II of the third party complaint, and the breach of contract claim brought by Artech in Count III of the third party complaint. The motion to deem SSHCs responses to defendants Local Rule 56.1 statement admitted (Docket Entry 109) is DENIED except to the limited extent set forth previously in Roman numeral V. (Patton, Christine) Modified on 2/22/2016 (Garvin, Brendan).
April 28, 2016
PDF | More
Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION entered denying 91 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 92 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 95 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 109 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts Admitted; adopting Report and Recommendations re 126 Report and Recommendations. (Halley, Taylor)