Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-11147 - VERRINDER v. WAL-MART CORPORATION et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-11147 - VERRINDER v. WAL-MART CORPORATION et al
March 3, 2015
PDF | More
Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered denying without prejudice 30 Motion to Unseal Document ; denying 30 Motion for Extension of Time; denying without prejudice 31 Motion to Amend ; denying 31 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 34 Motion to Compel. This case shall be dismissed without prejudice unless, within 30 days of the date of this order, the relator (1) retains local counsel and files a motion to appear pro hac vice; or (2) retains counsel for all purposes. (PSSA, 3)
June 21, 2016
PDF | More
Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. For the reasons set forth in the attached MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Defendant Wal-Marts Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 63) isALLOWED. Defendant Rite Aids Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 61)is ALLOWED. Defendant Kmarts Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 59)is ALLOWED in part. With respect to the generic drug allegationsonly, the Court allows the relator thirty days (July 21, 2016) to amend hiscomplaint to comply with Rule 9(b). (Molloy, Maryellen)