Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-12005 - McKinnon v. Ryan


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-12005 - McKinnon v. Ryan
April 11, 2017
PDF | More
Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal: ORDER entered. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Matthew McKinnon. Recommendation: This Court recommends that the District Court DENY the Petitioner Matthew McKinnon's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in its entirety. Objections to R&R due by 4/25/2017 (York, Steve)
August 7, 2017
PDF | More
Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. I adopt the report and recommendation issued on April 11, 2017. On June 22, 2017, the Supreme Court issued Weaver v. Massachusetts, which held: [W]hen a defendant raises a public-trial violation via an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, Strickland prejudice is not shown automatically. Instead, the burden is on the defendant to show either a reasonable probability of a different outcome in his or her case or... to show that the particular public-trial violation was so serious as to render his or her trial fundamentally unfair. 37 S. Ct. 1899, 1911 (2017). Petitioner has not shown either prejudice or fundamental unfairness in the circumstances of this case.The petition for habeas corpus relief (Docket No. 1) is DENIED. I DENY a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2253(c) on all objections because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)