Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-11720 - Provanzano v. MTD Products Company, et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-11720 - Provanzano v. MTD Products Company, et al
November 20, 2015
PDF | More
Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell: ORDER entered. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL (#27) granting in part and denying in part 27 Motion to Compel. See attached order for full details. (Russo, Noreen)
October 17, 2016
PDF | More
I, ALLOWED, but is, with respect to all other claims, DENIED.So ordered.(Caruso, Stephanie) (Main Document 97 replaced on 10/17/2016) (Caruso, Stephanie).Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDERFor the forgoing reasons,1) the motion for summary judgment of defendant MTD Products Co. (Docket No. 36) is, with respect to the breach of express warranty claim in Count I, ALLOWED, but is, with respect to all other claims, DENIED, and 2) the motion for summary judgment of defendant Lowes Home Centers, LLC (Docket No. 39) is, with respect to the breach of express warranty claim in Count I
October 17, 2016
PDF | More
lude the testimony of Dr. Sandra Metzler (Docket No. 53) is DENIED. So ordered.(Caruso, Stephanie)Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER,For the foregoing reasons, 1) Defendants motion to exclude the testimony of Mr. Kevin Sevart (Docket No. 38) is DENIED and2) Plaintiffs motion to exc
May 15, 2017
PDF | More
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered granting 150 Motion in Limine Order Court Security Personnel to Allow Exemplar Mower Into the Courthouse for Purposes of Trial (Caruso, Stephanie)
September 8, 2017
PDF | More
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDERFor the forgoing reasons,1) plaintiffs motion for judgment on his 93A claim (Docket No. 172) is DENIED and2) plaintiffs motion for judgment as a matter of law, or, in the alternative, for a new trial (Docket No. 179) is DENIED. So ordered.(Caruso, Stephanie)