Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-13086 - Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al v. Amerlux, LLC et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-13086 - Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al v. Amerlux, LLC et al
March 10, 2016
PDF | More
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered For the foregoing reasons set forth in the attached Order, the Court concludes that the Protective Order shall permit the three in-house counsel designated by Philips -- but no other retained counsel, unless such counsel registers as counsel of record -- to view materials designated as Attorneys Eyes Only. Further, the Protective Orders prosecution bar may not prohibit counsel from participating in claim amendments in the course of the proceedings specified as exclusions to the prosecution bar. Finally, the Court DENIES 33 Amerluxs Motion to Stay this action pending resolution of IPR. (Montes, Mariliz)