Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-10386 - Integrated Communications & Technologies, Inc. et al v. Hewlett-Packard Financial Services Company et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-10386 - Integrated Communications & Technologies, Inc. et al v. Hewlett-Packard Financial Services Company et al
January 24, 2017
PDF | More
cided. (Montes, Mariliz)District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. For the foregoing reasons, the Court: (1) ALLOWS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART,WITHOUT PREJUDICE, Defendant HPFS's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 46); (2) DENIESWITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendant HPFS India's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 57); and (3)DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 68). Plaintiffs have until February 8,2017, to file a motion for leave to amend and a proposed amended complaint, if they wish. Defendants may file any opposition to the motion within 14 days of the motion's filing. Alternatively, if Plaintiffs do not file a motion for leave to amend within 14 days, Defendants may renew any arguments from the instant Motions to Dismiss that have not been de
October 11, 2017
PDF | More
a Claim (Montes, Mariliz)District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS entered denying 109 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 110 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 111 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State