Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

16-12061 - LEE v. GRODOLSKY et al

Download Files


Document in Context
16-12061 - LEE v. GRODOLSKY et al
November 15, 2016
PDF | More
trative and filing fees at the time of filing his renewed complaint." Objections to R&R due by 11/29/2016(Belpedio, Lisa)Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Warren Antonio Lee. "This Court RECOMMENDS to the District Judge to whom this case is assigned that plaintiffs Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Docket #2) be DENIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(g) and this action be DISMISSED sua sponte without prejudice to plaintiff re-filing, provided he pays the $400.00 adminis
July 28, 2017
PDF | More
Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: For the reasons stated, 1. The court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 6) in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiffs Motion (Dkt. No. 2) for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff refiling, provided the applicable administrative and filing fees are paid in full at the time of filing. 2. Plaintiffs motions (Dkt. Nos. 12, 14, 17, and 20) are DENIED.It is So Ordered. See the attached memo and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)