Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-12144 - Swartz v. Bahr et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-12144 - Swartz v. Bahr et al
June 22, 2017
PDF | More
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 35 AND OTHER PENDING MOTIONS entered. 1. The defendants Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 35) is ALLOWED;2. Swartz's Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply (Doc. No. 53) is DENIED;3. Swartz's Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 54) is DENIED;4. Swartz's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 57) is DENIED;5. Swartz's Motion for Sanctions, to Strike Pleadings, and Appoint Counsel (Doc. No.58) is DENIED;6. Swartz's Motion for Leave to File a Reply (Doc. No. 61) is ALLOWED;7. Swartz's Motion for Leave to File a Response (Doc. No. 64) is DENIED; and8. The defendants Motion to Expedite (Doc. No. 66) is DENIED as moot.Should Swartz make any further filings with this Court, in this or any other action, the Court hereby ORDERS that he comply with the following standard filing requirements: (1) file only double-spaced pleadings and memoranda; (2) no memorandum supporting a motion shall exceed twenty pages unless a larger number of pages is authorized in advance by the Court; and (3) no reply memorandum shall exceed five pages unless a larger number of pages is authorizedin advance by the Court. A Copy of this Order has been mailed to the Plaintiff. (Montes, Mariliz)