Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-12538 - Malden Transportation, Inc. et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-12538 - Malden Transportation, Inc. et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
October 5, 2017
PDF | More
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered re Case Consolidation. See attached order.Associated Cases: 1:16-cv-12538-NMG et al.(Caruso, Stephanie)
November 3, 2017
PDF | More
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDERFor the forgoing reasons, plaintiffs motion for proposed entry of coordination order (Docket No. 68) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs shall resubmit, on or before Thursday, November 9, 2017, an amended proposed coordination order with the following amendments to its earlier proposed order (Docket No. 68-1):- The first sentence of Paragraph 4 shall read:The Actions will be prosecuted collectively by the Executive Committee.- Paragraph 9 shall be deleted in its entirety.- The order shall include a provision stating that:The Executive Committee will be represented by a Liaison Counsel who will have responsibility for:1) Operating as the main point of contact between plaintiffs and defendants;2) Operating as the main point of contact between plaintiffs and the Court;3) Serving and responding to unified discovery;4) Coordinating each of plaintiffs written submissions to the Court in a unified memorandum;5) Coordinating plaintiffs schedules fora) taking and defending depositions;b) taking the lead in each deposition; andc) taking the lead in oral arguments before the Court to avoid redundancies and needless, multiple presentations.Plaintiffs shall inform the Court of the individual whom they have selected as Liaison Counsel on or before Wednesday, November 15, 2017, in default of which the Court will appoint Liaison Counsel.All other deadlines previously set in this litigation remain unchanged.So ordered.(Caruso, Stephanie)
December 29, 2017
PDF | More
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDERFor the foregoing reasons, the motion to dismiss of defendants Travis Kalanick and Garrett Camp (Docket No. 70), is ALLOWED and the consolidated motion to dismiss of defendants Uber, Travis Kalanick and Garrett Camp (Docket No. 72) is, with respect to the claims of antitrust violation and interference with advantageous business relationships and the Taxi Maintenance claim of civil conspiracy, ALLOWED, but is otherwise DENIED.The following claims of the named plaintiffs remain pending:1) the claims of all plaintiffs for unfair competition under the common law and M.G.L. c. 93A ยง 11.2) the claims of the Anoush plaintiffs for:a) aiding and abetting unfair competition in violation of the common law and M.G.L. c. 93A, andb) civil conspiracy to commit unfair competition in violation of the common law and M.G.L. c. 93A.So ordered.(Caruso, Stephanie)
June 18, 2018
PDF | More
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER.For the foregoing reasons, defendants' partial motion to dismiss the antitrust claims in the Malden, Dot Ave, Max Luc and Taxi Maintenance amended complaint (Docket No. 109) is ALLOWED.So ordered. (Franklin, Yvonne)