Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-30187 - Murphy v. Baker et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-30187 - Murphy v. Baker et al
August 11, 2016
PDF | More
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ORDER entered. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on Defendants' 11 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint. Recommendation: that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be denied without prejudice and that Plaintiff be given 45 days in which to file an amended complaint. If no amended complaint is filed, the court recommends that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice and that the case be closed. See attached R&R for complete details. Objections to R&R due by 8/25/2016. (Calderon, Melissa)
September 20, 2016
PDF | More
Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: For the reasons stated, Based upon the comprehensive and well-reasoned analysis presented in the Report and Recommendation, and noting there are no objections, the court, upon de novo review, hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. (Dkt. No. 22.) As a result, Defendants 11 motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice. Furthermore, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file an amended complaint within 45 days of this order which: (1) Sets forth factual allegations and legal claims or counts in separately numbered, simple, concise, and direct paragraphs; (2) Contains short and plain statements of the legal claims showing that Plaintiff is entitled to relief; and (3) Contains a demand for judgment specifying the relief that Plaintiff seeks from each named defendant. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order and no amended complaint is filed, this action is subject to dismissal. It is So Ordered. See the attached memo and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)
May 4, 2017
PDF | More
that Plaintiff's claims in Counts I-VI of the complaint be dismissed with prejudice insofar as they seek punative or compensatory damages or the payment of fees or costs or prospective injunctive relief because the Court cannot order any such relief against these Defendants, and that Counts I-VI be dismissed with prejudice for the additional reason that Plaintiff has not stated any cognizable claim under 1983 against any of these Defendants; cc/Pltf. Objections to R&R due by 5/18/2017. (Finn, Mary) Modified on 5/4/2017 to correct a typo. (Finn, Mary).Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ORDER entered. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 31 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Linda S. Spears, Marylou Sudders, Charles D. Baker Recommendation: The Court recommends
May 30, 2017
PDF | More
Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: For the reasons stated, the Report and Recommendation, and noting there are no objections, the court, upon de novo review, hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. (Dkt. No. 36.) As a result, Defendants motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 31) is ALLOWED and Plaintiffs amended complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is So Ordered. See the attached memo and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)