Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-30044 - USA v. Marte et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-30044 - USA v. Marte et al
October 5, 2016
PDF | More
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying so much of the Government's detention motion as it seeks pre-trial detention of Anthony Patino (10). Bail is set in the amount of $5,000.00 to be SECURED by cash. The United States Marshal is ordered to keep Patino in custody until a surety bond is posted and all other conditions of release, including installation of location monitoring equipment, are satisfied, at which time Patino will appear in court for a further hearing on the conditions of release. See attached Memo & Order and proposed conditions of release for complete details. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit - Proposed Conditions of Release) (Calderon, Melissa)[3:16-mj-03187-KAR]
October 6, 2016
PDF | More
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying so much of the Government's detention motion as it seeks pre-trial detention of Jovanni Rodriguez (5). Bail is set in the amount of $20,000.00 to be SECURED by the equity in 18 Chester St, Springfield, MA. The United States Marshal is ordered to keep Rodriguez in custody until a surety bond is posted and all other conditions of release, including installation of location monitoring equipment, are satisfied, at which time Rodriguez will appear in court for a further hearing on the conditions of release. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit - Proposed Conditions of Release and # (2) Supplement - Procedures for Posting Real Estate) (Calderon, Melissa)[3:16-mj-03187-KAR]
January 23, 2018
PDF | More
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ORDER entered. Order Regarding Defendants' Motion to Compel Discovery (Dkt. Nos. 341 & 347) as to Alberto Marte (1) and Juan Perez (8). The government is directed to provide the court, by February 14, 2018, responses to the following inquiries in the form of an affidavit from a representative of the DEA with personal knowledge:       1.   Did the DEA initiate the investigation in the Dominican Republic that led to the interception of Defendant Marte's communications with a target of the Dominican wiretap?       2.   Did the DEA request that Dominican officials apply for the court order authorizing the Dominican wiretap that intercepted Defendant Marte's communications?       3.   Did DEA agents supervise, direct, or control the Dominican wiretap that intercepted Defendant Marte's communications with a target of the Dominican wiretap?       4.   Did DEA agents personally participate in intercepting and recording Defendant Marte's communications with a target of the Dominican wiretap? It is so ordered. (See attached order for complete details) (Calderon, Melissa)Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ORDER entered. Order Regarding Defendants' Motion to Compel Discovery (Dkt. Nos. 341 & 347) as to Alberto Marte (1) and Juan Perez (8). The government is directed to provide the court, by February 14, 2018, responses to the following inquiries in the form of an affidavit from a representative of the DEA with personal knowledge:       1.   Did the DEA initiate the investigation in the Dominican Republic that led to the interception of Defendant Marte's communications with a target of the Dominican wiretap?       2.   Did the DEA request that Dominican officials apply for the court order authorizing the Dominican wiretap that intercepted Defendant Marte's communications?       3.   Did DEA agents supervise, direct, or control the Dominican wiretap that intercepted Defendant Marte's communications with a target of the Dominican wiretap?       4.   Did DEA agents personally participate in intercepting and recording Defendant Marte's communications with a target of the Dominican wiretap? It is so ordered. (See attached order for complete details) (Calderon, Melissa)
February 20, 2018
PDF | More
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Regarding Defendants' Motion to Compel Discovery (Dkt. Nos. 341 [Perez] & 347 [Marte]). For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to compel is DENIED. See attached Memo & Order for complete details. (Calderon, Melissa)Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Regarding Defendants' Motion to Compel Discovery (Dkt. Nos. 341 [Perez] & 347 [Marte]). For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to compel is DENIED. See attached Memo & Order for complete details. (Calderon, Melissa)
March 6, 2018
PDF | More
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Government's Motion to Reconsider the Court's Memorandum and Order regarding Defendants' Motion to Compel Discovery entered. For the foregoing reasons and for the reasons stated in the Court's Original Order, the court ALLOWS the Governments Motion to Reconsider (Dkt. No. 426) and DENIES Defendants' Motion to Compel (Dkt. Nos. 341 [Perez] & 347 [Marte]). (Finn, Mary) Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Government's Motion to Reconsider the Court's Memorandum and Order regarding Defendants' Motion to Compel Discovery entered. For the foregoing reasons and for the reasons stated in the Court's Original Order, the court ALLOWS the Governments Motion to Reconsider (Dkt. No. 426) and DENIES Defendants' Motion to Compel (Dkt. Nos. 341 [Perez] & 347 [Marte]). (Finn, Mary)