Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-30043 - Creative Machining and Molding Corporation v. CRC Polymer Systems, Inc.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-30043 - Creative Machining and Molding Corporation v. CRC Polymer Systems, Inc.
March 22, 2018
PDF | More
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ORDER entered. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Alltrista Plastics, LLC d/b/a Jarden Plastics Solutions ("Jarden") and the Yankee Candle Company, Inc. ("Yankee Candle") to Designate Witnesses and Produce Documents as Required by Deposition Subpoenas Served on Both Companies is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART on the terms set forth in this Order. CMM's motion is GRANTED insofar as counsel for CMM is directed to confer with Yankee Candle's counsel to identify no more than four Yankee Candle employees whose active and archived email accounts will be searched using no more than ten relevant search terms. This further search for responsive dos close, the Court concludes that no award of counsel fees or costs to non-parties Jarden and Yankee Candle is justified. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(s)(5). (Finn, Mary)cuments shall be completed no later than April 6, 2018. If any additional relevant documents are identified and produced to CMM by Yankee Candle, copies shall be produced to CRC as well. CMM's motion is otherwise DENIED. Although the issue i