Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-022 - USA v. HITCHCOCK


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-022 - USA v. HITCHCOCK
August 4, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION as to CHRISTOPHER HITCHCOCK re 74 MOTION to Comply with Castro v. United States, 68 MOTION to Reduce Sentence. Objections to R&R due by 8/22/2016. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (CWP)
September 2, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE as to CHRISTOPHER HITCHCOCK Re: 77 Report and Recommended Decision, 68 Motion to Reduce Sentence, granting 74 Motion to Comply with Castro v. United States By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (mlm)
June 12, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION as to CHRISTOPHER HITCHCOCK re 68 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255). Objections to R&R due by 6/26/2017. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (CWP)
January 5, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISIONdenying 68 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) as to CHRISTOPHER HITCHCOCK (1); affirming 85 Report and Recommendations No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. as to CHRISTOPHER HITCHCOCK (1) By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (sfw)