Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-113 - INMAN v. LANDRY


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-113 - INMAN v. LANDRY
April 17, 2015
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 6 MOTION for Bail filed by FRANK INMAN, 7 MOTION for Bail filed by FRANK INMAN. Objections to R&R due by 5/4/2015. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (CWP)
May 13, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 Report and Recommendations and denying 6 Motion for Bail and denying 7 Second Motion for Bail. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
June 25, 2015
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by FRANK INMAN. Objections to R&R due by 7/13/2015. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (CWP)
August 4, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 23 Report and Recommendations. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0.; granting 25 Motion to Dismiss; denying in part and dismissing in part 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)
November 3, 2015
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 34 MOTION for Release filed by FRANK INMAN, 30 MOTION FOR RELEASE filed by FRANK INMAN. Objections to R&R due by 11/20/2015. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (CWP)
December 2, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 35 Report and Recommendations; denying 30 Motion for release ; denying 34 Motion for release. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
February 23, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 44 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by FRANK INMAN. Objections to R&R due by 3/11/2016. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (CWP)
March 21, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 49 Report and Recommendations; No evidentiary hearing is warranted under Rule 8 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases 44 Order to Show Cause; dismissing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)