Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

05-1396 - August Technology Corporation et al v. Camtek Ltd


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
05-1396 - August Technology Corporation et al v. Camtek Ltd
December 2, 2005
PDF | More
ORDER denying 11 Motion to Change Venue (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J Davis on 12/02/2005. (SMS)
January 3, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION and ORDER on Markman Hearing(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on January 2, 2008. (SMS)
January 22, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER denying 276 Letter motion to reconsider to District Judge filed by Camtek, Ltd (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on January 22, 2008. (SMS)
July 14, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER denying 280 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on July 13, 2008. (SMS)
July 27, 2010
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. Based on the files, records, and proceedings herein IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Camtek's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law of No Literal Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,926,298 or, in the Alternative, for a New Trial on Literal Infringement 551 is DENIED. 2. Camtek's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law of No Lost Profits and a New Trial or Remittitur Regarding Reasonable Royalty 556 is DENIED. 3. Camtek's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law That the Asserted Claims of the '6,298 Patent are Invalid for Obviousness, or, in the Alternative, for a New Trial 561 is DENIED. 4. Camtek's Rule 60 Motion for Clarification of the Order on Final Judgment and Injunctive Relief 601 is DENIED. 5. Camtek's Motion to Stay Enforcement of the Judgment 566 is DENIED AS MOOT. 6. August's Motion for Attorneys Fees 572 is TERMINATED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 7/25/10. (GRR)
November 17, 2010
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 627 Brief filed by August Technology Corporation. Objections to R&R due by 12/2/2010. Signed by Chief Mag. Judge Arthur J. Boylan on 11/17/2010. (LMB)
January 7, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER. Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated November 17, 2010 683. 2. Plaintiff's Brief in Support of Request for Supplemental Damages 627 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: a. Plaintiff is awarded supplemental damages in the amount of $645,946; b. Plaintiff is granted leave to bring such additional motions for supplemental damages as are supported by Plaintiff's post-verdict discovery; and c. Plaintiff's motion is denied in all other respects. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 1/7/11. (GRR)
February 23, 2011
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Plaintiffs' Motion for Enforcement of the Permanent Injunction and for Attorney's Fees 691 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 2/23/11. (GRR)
August 11, 2011
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: 1. Plaintiffs Motion For Contempt [Docket No. 715] be granted. 2. Defendant be ordered to pay plaintiffs $1,291,892, reflecting double damages, as a sanction for contempt. 3. Plaintiffs be awarded award of attorneys fees and costs in an amount to be determined by the court, reflecting fees incurred in bringing the instant motion for contempt. Objections to R&R due by 9/1/2011. Signed by Chief Mag. Judge Arthur J. Boylan on 08/11/2011. (lmb)
March 26, 2012
PDF | More
is referred to Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel for determination of reasonable attorney fees; and 6. Defendant's Motion to Set Aside the Magistrate Judge's Finding of Willful Infringement 750 is DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 3/26/12. (GRR) Modified on 2/10/2015 (las). Modified link on 2/10/2015 (lmb).***VACATED - SEE ORDER 1011 - MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan's Report and Recommendation dated August 11, 2011 731; 2. Plaintiffs' Motion for Contempt 715 is GRANTED; 3. Defendant is ordered to pay Plaintiffs $1,291,892 as a sanction for contempt; 4. Plaintiffs are awarded reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred in bringing their Motion for Contempt; 5. this matter
April 10, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to this Court's Assignment of Cases Order dated December 19, 2008, the above-captioned actions shall be resubmitted to the Clerk of Court for reassignment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is further directed to void and reuse two cards on the Patent Case List in the automated case assignment system.(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 4/10/12. (GRR)
August 17, 2012
PDF | More
s denied in all other respects. 2. Camtek Ltd's 790 Rule 60 and Rule 59 Motion for Relief from Order Relating to Willfulness is DENIED. 3. Camtek Ltd.'s 797 Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Award of Fees and Costs are overruled as moot, and the Court affirms the Magistrate Judge's 795 May 1, 2012 Order. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on August 17, 2012. (DML) Modified on 2/10/2015 (las). Modified link on 2/10/2015 (lmb).***VACATED - SEE ORDER 1011 -MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 1. Camtek Ltd's 780 Rule 60 Motion for Relief from Contempt Order and Sanctions Award is granted in part and denied in part, as follows: a. The motion is granted in part with respect to sanctions. Camtek, Ltd. is relieved of the previous 764 order to pay double damages and. is ordered to pay Plaintiffs $645,946 in lost profits, as a sanction for contempt. b. The motion i
March 31, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 818 Defendant's Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony and report of Frances McCloskey; denying 823 Defendant's Motion for Claim Construction; denying 823 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement; denying 828 Defendant's Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony and report of Joseph Mundy; granting 832 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement; denying as moot 840 Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony and report of John Phillip Mellor(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on March 31, 2014. (HAZ) CC: Counsel of record. (kt) Unsealed per 974 Order on 4/21/2014 (TSS).
February 9, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying defendant's 966 Motion for New Proceedings and Jury Trial; granting in part and denying in part plaintiffs' 981 Motion for Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on February 9, 2015. (DML)
August 24, 2015
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that Plaintiff's motion for attorneys' fees (ECF No. 1018) be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 9/8/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel on 8/21/2015. (lmb)
September 16, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS denying 1018 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by Rudolph Technologies, Inc. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on September 16, 2015. (HAZ)
June 24, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that Plaintiff' motion to enforce Supersedeas Bond No. 09185259 (ECF No. 1081) be GRANTED. Camtek must pay Rudolph the amount owed to it, including interest accruing. Objections to R&R due by 7/11/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel on 6/24/2016. (lmb)
July 22, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting 1081 Motion for Bond filed by Rudolph Technologies, Inc. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on July 22, 2016. (HAZ)