Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

07-4772 - Burgi et al v. Gurstel Law Firm, PA et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
07-4772 - Burgi et al v. Gurstel Law Firm, PA et al
May 16, 2008
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION That this action be dismissed for failure to comply with this Court's Order of April 17, 2008, for failure to effect proper service on the Defendant OSI Portfolio Services, and for lack of prosecution. Objections to R&R due by 6/3/2008. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson on 5/16/08. (JMH)
June 10, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations 28 IT IS ORDERED: That this action is dismissed, as to OSI Portfolio Services only, for failure to comply with this Court's Order of April 17, 2008, for failure to effect proper service on the Defendant OSI Portfolio Services, and for lack of prosecution.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 6/6/08. (sf)
September 24, 2008
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1. That Gurstel's Motion to Dismiss 6 be granted. 2. That the Burgis' Federal causes of action be dismissed with prejudice. 3. That the Burgis' State law cause of action under the Minnesota Collection Agencies Act, Minnesota Statutes Section 332.37, be dismissed with prejudice, and any remaining State law actions be dismissed without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 10/10/2008. Signed by Chief Mag. Judge Raymond L. Erickson on 09/24/2008. (jz)
October 17, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER adopting 30 Report and Recommendation. IT IS ORDERED 1. That Gurstel's Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 6] is granted. 2. That the Burgis' Federal causes of action are dismissed with prejudice. 3. That the Burgis' State law cause of action under the Minnesota Collection Agencies Act, Minnesota Statutes Section 332.37, is dismissed with prejudice, and any remaining State law actions be dismissed without prejudice. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 10/17/08. (sf)