Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

08-831 - Hartfield v. Minnesota, State of


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
08-831 - Hartfield v. Minnesota, State of
April 2, 2008
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1. That the Petitioners Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief under Title 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 [Docket No. 1] be summarily dismissed, with prejudice. 2. That the Petitioners Motion for Appointment of Counsel [Docket No. 2] be denied, as moot. 3. That the Petitioners Motion To File: Supplemental Documents In Support of Claims [Docket No. 3] be denied, as moot. - 14 - 4. That the Petitioners Motion To File: For Requesting Discovery[Docket No. 4] be denied, as moot. 5. That the Petitioners Motion To File: For An Evidentiary Hearing [Docket No. 5] be denied, as moot. 6. That the Petitioners Application to proceed In Forma Pauperis [Docket No. 6] be denied, as moot. Objections to R&R due by 4/18/2008. Signed by Chief Mag. Judge Raymond L. Erickson on 04/02/2008. (jz)
May 6, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 and denying as moot 6 Application to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Roylee Hartfield; denying as moot 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Roylee Hartfield; denying as moot 3 Motion for Leave to File filed by Roylee Hartfield; denying as moot 4 Motion for Discovery filed by Roylee Hartfield; denying 10 Motion to Amend/Correct filed by Roylee Hartfield; and denying as moot 5 Motion for Hearing filed by Roylee Hartfield Petitioner's application is summarily dismissed with prejudice. Petitioner is not entitled to a COA. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on May 6, 2008. (slf)