Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

11-313 - Afremov v. Jarayan et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
11-313 - Afremov v. Jarayan et al
March 28, 2012
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: 1. Plaintiff's motion to dismiss Defendants' Counterclaims and Third-Party Complaint [Doc. No. 33] is GRANTED IN PART (insofar as it seeks dismissal of a part of Count One, the part of Count Two Plaintiff challenges, and Counts Five, and Seven), DENIED IN PART (insofar as it seeks to dismiss the other part of Count One, as well as Counts Eight and Nine, to clarify the pleadings, and to strike certain allegations) and DENIED AS MOOT IN PART (insofar as it seeks to dismiss the original Third-Party Complaint); and 2. Third-Party Defendant John Atzbach's motion to dismiss the Third-Party Complaint [Doc. No. 36] is DENIED (without prejudice to its renewal if Third-Party Plaintiffs are unable to substantiate their claim for contribution or indemnity). (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 3/28/12. (LPH)
October 24, 2012
PDF | More
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT: granting Plaintiff's 128 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and 141 Motion for Default Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 10/24/12. (LPH)
October 24, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER : 1. Third-Party Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 121] is GRANTED; 2. The Amended Third-Party Complaint is dismissed in its entirety on the merits and with prejudice; and 3. Third-Party Defendant's Motion for Default Judgment and for Attorney's Fees as to Third-Party Plaintiffs [Doc. No. 137] is DENIED AS MOOT in part as to default judgment, and DENIED in part as to the request for attorney's fees (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 10/24/12. (LPH)
November 26, 2013
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that: 1. Afremov's Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Artur Jarayan Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court for Violating the Courts July 26, 2012 Receivership Order [Doc. No. 150] be DENIED; and 2. Jarayan not be held in civil or criminal contempt of court. Objections to R&R due by 12/13/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau on 11/26/13. (jam)
January 13, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER re 174 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: 1. Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge Rau's November 26, 2013 Report and Recommendation to Deny Plaintiff's Motion for an Order to Show Cause [Doc. No. 175] are OVERRULED in part and SUSTAINED in part; 2. The Court ADOPTS in part, and DECLINES to adopt in part, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 174]; 3. Plaintiff's Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Artur Jarayan Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court for Violating the Court's July 26, 2012 Receivership Order [Doc. No. 150] is GRANTED in part and DENIED without prejudice in part, as detailed herein; and 4. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on Jarayan via email by the end of the day on January 17, 2014 (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 1/13/14. (LPH)