Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

11-2558 - Dixon v. Clearwire Corporation


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
11-2558 - Dixon v. Clearwire Corporation
June 11, 2012
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that: 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 4] be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: a. Defendant's motion to dismiss with regards to the RICO claim be GRANTED and the claim should be dismissed WITH PREJUDICE; and b. Defendant's motion to dismiss concerning the breach of contract claim be DENIED. 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 12] be DENIED without prejudice. 3. Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions Against Defendant and its Counsel Kerry Middleton and Rhiannon Beckendorf on Grounds of Perjury [Docket No. 14] be DENIED. 4. Plaintiff's Motion to Default Judgment [Docket No. 18] be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 6/25/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron on 6/11/12. cc: Joe Dixon(jam)
July 31, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER : IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1.Defendants Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 4] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:a.Defendants Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with regard to Plaintiffs RICO claim. Plaintiffs RICO claim is dismissed WITH PREJUDICE.b.Defendants Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with regard to Plaintiffs breach of contract claim.2.Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 12] is DENIED without prejudice.3.Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions Against Defendant and its Counsel Kerry Middleton and Rhiannon Beckendorf on Grounds of Perjury [Docket No. 14] is DENIED.4.Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment [Docket No. 18] is DENIED.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on July 31, 2012. (slf)cc: Joseph Dixon Modified on 7/31/2012 (jam).
November 25, 2013
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 110 MOTION for judgment against defendant Clearwire Corporation and for sanctions against its counsels on ground of surprise by defendant Clearwire Corporation. Invoked under FRCVP 609b filed by Joseph Dixon, 92 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Clearwire Corporation. 117MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings, MOTION For Relief by Joseph Dixon. Objections to R&R due by 12/9/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron on 11/25/13. cc: Dixon(jam)
February 6, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER adopting in part Report and Recommendation 126: The Court's Order of July 31, 2012 52 is VACATED insofar as it denied Defendant's Motion to Dismiss in part. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 4 is GRANTED in full. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 92 is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Against Defendant Clearwire Corporation [etc.] 110 is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion to the Court for Relief and Judgment to be Granted Plaintiff [etc.] 117 is DENIED. Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 129 is DENIED AS MOOT. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on February 6, 2014. (CBC) CC: Dixon. (kt)
February 24, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER denying 138 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on February 24, 2014. (CBC)