Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-2167 - Mitchell v. Aitkin County et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-2167 - Mitchell v. Aitkin County et al
February 27, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER: Defendant Hennepin County's Motion to Dismiss 22 is GRANTED. Defendant County of Anoka's Motion to Dismiss 35 is GRANTED. The Motion to Dismiss 42 of Defendant Counties of Aitkin, Beltrami, Carver, Chisago, Cook, Freeborn, Kandiyohi, McLeod, Mower, Rice, Stearns, Steele, and Wright is GRANTED. Defendant Ramsey County's Motion to Dismiss 48 is GRANTED. The Motion pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and Rule 12(c) 53 of Defendant Cities of Rosemount, Aitkin, Anoka, Arlington, Blaine, Bloomington, Blue Earth, Brooklyn Park, Cannon Falls, Champlin, Cottage Grove, Crosby, Crosslake, Green Isle, Hopkins, Lake Shore, Lakeville, Maple Grove, Maplewood, Marshall, Minnetonka, Northfield, Plymouth, Red Wing, Rosemount, Roseville, St. Francis, Wabasha, White Bear Lake, and Woodbury is GRANTED. Defendant City of Saint Paul's Motion to Dismiss 67 is GRANTED. Defendant County of Dakota's Motion to Dismiss 69 is GRANTED. Defendant City of Edina's Motion to Dismiss 82 is GRANTED. Defendant City of Minneapolis's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 103 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on February 27, 2014. (CBC)
March 4, 2014
PDF | More
AMENDED ORDER: (1) The judgment docketed on February 28, 2014 110 is VACATED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a). (2) Defendant Hennepin County's Motion to Dismiss 22 is GRANTED. (3) Defendant Anoka County's Motion to Dismiss 35 is GRANTED. (4) The Motion to Dismiss 42 of Defendant Counties of Aitkin, Beltrami, Carver, Chisago, Cook, Freeborn, Kandiyohi, McLeod, Mower, Rice, Stearns, Steele, and Wright is GRANTED. (5) Defendant Ramsey County's Motion to Dismiss 48 is GRANTED. (6) The Motion pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and Rule 12(c) 53 of Defendant Cities of Rosemount, Aitkin, Anoka, Arlington, Blaine, Bloomington, Blue Earth, Brooklyn Park, Cannon Falls, Champlin, Cottage Grove, Crosby, Crosslake, Green Isle, Hopkins, Lake Shore, Lakeville, Maple Grove, Maplewood, Marshall, Minnetonka, Northfield, Plymouth, Red Wing, Rosemount, Roseville, St. Francis, Wabasha, White Bear Lake, and Woodbury is GRANTED. (7) Defendof Hopkins, City of Maple Grove, City of Saint Paul, City of Minneapolis, Anoka County, Freeborn County, and Hennepin County. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on March 4, 2014. (CBC)ant City of Saint Paul's Motion to Dismiss 67 is GRANTED. (8) Defendant County of Dakota's Motion to Dismiss 69 is GRANTED. (9) Defendant City of Edina's Motion to Dismiss 82 is GRANTED. (10) Defendant City of Minneapolis's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 103 is GRANTED. (11) Counts II and III of Plaintiff's Complaint are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all Defendants. (12) Count IV of Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice as to all Defendants. (13) Count I of Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice as to the following Defendants: Aitkin County, Beltrami County, Carver County, Chisago County, Cook County, Dakota County, Kandiyohi County, McLeod County, Mower County, Rice County, St. Louis County, Stearns County, Steele County, and Wright County, Ramsey County, City of Aitkin, City of Anoka, City of Arlington, City of Bloomington, City of Blue Earth, City of Brooklyn Park, City of Cannon Falls, City of Champlin, City of Cottage Grove, City of Crosby, City of Crosslake, City of Green Isle, City of Lake Shore, City of Lakeville, City of Maplewood, City of Marshall, City of Minnetonka, City of Northfield, City of Plymouth, City of Red Wing, City of Rosemount, City of Roseville, City of St. Francis, City of Wabasha, City of White Bear Lake, and City of Woodbury. (14) Count I of Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice as to the following Defendants: City of Blaine, City of Edina, City
January 8, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER: (1) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 163] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (2) The Motion is GRANTED as to the alleged DPPA violations that occurred on: October 1, 2009; July 19, 2010; and September 6, 2011. (3) The Motion is DENIED as to the alleged DPPA violations that occurred on: October 4, 2009; October 10, 2011; and December 21, 2011. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on January 8, 2018. (CBC)