Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-114 - USA v. Evers


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-114 - USA v. Evers
September 22, 2015
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION as to Patrick Jon Evers RECOMMENDS 27 MOTION to Suppress Statements be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 10/6/2015 Responses to Objections to R&R due by 10/20/2015. Order on R&R Issue Date 11/19/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 9/22/15. (MKG)
November 3, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 39 as to Patrick Jon Evers. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung dated September 22, 2015 39. Defendant's Motion toSuppress Statements 27 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 11/3/15. (KMW)
March 14, 2016
PDF | More
VACATED, see Order by Judge Davis filed on 3/15/16, document number 85. ORDER as to Patrick Jon Evers (1). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Government's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Joseph Warpeha, Ph.D. 81 is DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 3/14/16. (GRR) Modified text on 3/16/2016 (LEG).
March 15, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER as to Patrick Jon Evers. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court's Order denying the Motion for Reconsideration dated March 14, 2016 82 is VACATED. 2. Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Government's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Joseph Warpeha, Ph.D. 81 is GRANTED. Dr. Warpeha's testimony is limited to explaining the physiology and body mechanics of the exercises that Defendant is doing in the surveillance video recordings, including what parts of the body are worked or stressed during these exercises. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 3/15/16. (GRR)
March 17, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER as to Patrick Jon Evers (1). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The Government's Motion in Limine to Preclude the Admission of Medical Records 84 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. If Defendant can show that Exhibit 2 was ordered by his treating physician to treat his back condition, the motion to exclude Exhibit 2 is denied. 2. If Defendant can show that Exhibit 3 and Exhibit 4 are related to his back injury, the motion to exclude Exhibits 3 and 4 is denied. 3. The motion to exclude Exhibit 6 is granted because under Federal Rule of Evidence 403, any probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of confusing and misleading the jury. Exhibit 6 is related to the time period after the alleged crimes, and it is focuses on Defendants hip arthritis, which was not a basis for Defendants workers compensation benefits. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 3/17/16. (GRR)
August 9, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:Defendant's Motion for Judgment of Acquittal or, in the Alternative, New Trial as to Count 2 102 is DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 8/8/16. (GRR)