Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-2744 - 4Brava, LLC v. Sachs et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-2744 - 4Brava, LLC v. Sachs et al
August 24, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying plaintiff's 10 Motion for Preliminary Injunction(Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on August 24, 2015. (DML)
March 30, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Signature's (100) Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims/Crossclaims; granting Signature's (105) Motion for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims; granting LeDucs' (108) Motion for Summary Judgment on the Crossclaims and Third Party Complaint; denying Signature's (112) Motion for Affirmative Summary Judgment; granting 4Brava's (121) Motion for Summary Judgment on the Crossclaims and Third Party Complaint; Reversing District Court Decision (138) ORDER RE: APPEAL/OBJECTION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Judge in case 0:15-cv-02743-JRT-DTS; granting in part and denying in part 4Brava's(102) Motion for Affirmative Summary Judgment; Reversing District Court Decision (119) ORDER RE: APPEAL/OBJECTION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Judge in case 0:15-cv-02744-JRT-DTS(Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on March 30, 2017. Associated Cases: 0:15-cv-02744-JRT-DTS, 0:15-cv-02743-JRT-DTS(DML)
June 29, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommends 1. Defendant Sachs be found in contempt of court for his failure to appear as ordered at the May 24, 2017 hearing, of which contempt he purged himself by appearing at the June 16, 2017 hearing. 2. Each Defendant be found in contempt of court for failure to provide the discovery ordered by this Court in May 2016 and again in May 2017. [Civil 15-2744, Docket No. 160]. Defendants can purge themselves of contempt by fully complying with these orders. 3. Defendant Sachs be found in contempt of court for failing to assist in the wind up of Three Two Eight's company affairs by providing financial information and documents, issuing payments to remaining creditors and distributing additional funds pursuant to Minn. Stat. Ch. 322B. Sachs has partially purged himself of contempt by remitting a partial payment of $572,000 to Plaintiffs on June 20, 2017. 4. Chief Judge John R. Tunheim's March 30, 2017 Order provided Sachs three months to execute and file Three Two Eight's termination papers. Given the circumstances the Court recognizes that the windup of Three Two Eight will not occur by June 30, 2017, and recommends that the deadline be extended to August 31, 2017. Sachs is required to produce all information necessary to facilitate the windup of Three Two Eight. 5. Defendants be found in contempt for failing to pay Plaintiffs' attorneys' fees as ordered by the Court [Civil 15-2744. Docket No. 198], of which contempt they purged themselves by paying the fees on June 19, 2017. 6. Discovery will be reopened regarding the newly-produced documents and as concerns the dissolution of Defendant DSC Products Holding, LLC. Discovery is not stayed because Sachs's personal bankruptcy and the bankruptcy of Defendant DSC Products, Inc. have been terminated. The Court will issue a new scheduling order after it conducts a settlement conference. A separate Order for Settlement Conference will issue shortly. 7. As ordered at the hearing, Defendants have provided the Court with complete access to the document repository "Basecamp" so that the Court can assure itself that discovery has been completed. 8. Defendants' counsel shall review all e-mails in Defendants' possession for production to Plaintiffs and/or placement on a privilege log no later than July 14, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 6/29/17. Associated Cases: 0:15-cv-02743-JRT-DTS, 0:15-cv-02744-JRT-DTS(LPH)
July 24, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in Docket No. 233 in 0:15-cv-02743-JRT-DTS and Docket No. 241 in 0:15-cv-02744-JRT-DTS(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on July 24, 2017. Associated Cases: 0:15-cv-02743-JRT-DTS, 0:15-cv-02744-JRT-DTS(HAZ)
December 27, 2017
PDF | More
d T. Schultz on 12/26/17. (LPH)REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommends 1. that 296 MOTION to Remand to State Court be denied in part and granted in part; 2. that defendants pay appropriate attorney fees and costs associated with the litigation in federal court, consistent with the Court's opinion; 3. that the 287 MOTION for Contempt be granted; and 4. The Court lacks jurisdiction over the civil theft claim for which 4Brava filed a renewed request for summary judgment, as set forth in 4Brava's Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment [Docket No. 311]. The Court denies without prejudice 4Brava's remaining requests to amend the Summary Judgment Order, consistent with the Court's opinion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Davi
January 17, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER: re 345 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Counsels Expedited Objection to the December 27, 2017 Order Denying the Motions to Withdraw [Case No. 15-2743, Docket No. 316; Case No. 15-2744, Docket No. 345] is OVERRULED. (Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 1/17/2018. (JMK)
May 17, 2018
PDF | More
C, DSC Products, Inc., Daniel Sachs (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 5/17/2018. (HAZ) cc: Hennepin county. Modified text on 5/21/2018 (MMG).MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting 287 Motion for Contempt filed by 4Brava, LLC, and granting in part and denying in part 296 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by DSC Products Holding, LL
May 17, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re (371 in 0:15-cv-02743-JRT-DTS) Report and Recommendations and (399 in 0:15-cv-02744-JRT-DTS) Report and Recommendations, OVERRULING objections (402 in 0:15-cv-02744-JRT-DTS) Sealed Document filed by Skolnick & Joyce, P.A. and (375 in 0:15-cv-02743-JRT-DTS) Sealed Document filed by Skolnick & Joyce, P.A., and DENYING Counsel's Request to Stay the Proceedings Pending Appeal (363 in 0:15-cv-02743-JRT-DTS) Letter to Magistrate Judge filed by Skolnick & Joyce, P.A. and (392 in 0:15-cv-02744-JRT-DTS) Letter to Magistrate Judge filed by Skolnick & Joyce, P.A.(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 5/17/2018. Associated Cases: 0:15-cv-02744-JRT-DTS, 0:15-cv-02743-JRT-DTS(HAZ)