Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-3444 - Kral v. Reiser et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-3444 - Kral v. Reiser et al
June 24, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommends that: 1. Kral's Complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. Kral's motion to compel (ECF No. 5) be DENIED without prejudice. 3. Nelson's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 30) be DENIED without prejudice. 4. State Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 41) be DENIED without prejudice. 5. HCMC's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 54) be DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel on 6/24/16. (LPH) cc: Kral
July 20, 2016
PDF | More
Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 7/20/2016. (BJS) Modified text on 7/21/2016 (LEG). cc: David J. KralORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel's June 24, 2016 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 67) is ADOPTED. 2. Kral's Complaint (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3. Kral's motion to compel (Doc. No. 5) is DENIED. 4. Nelson's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 30) is DENIED. 5. State Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 41) is DENIED. 6. HCMC's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 54) is DENIED. (Written