Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-2666 - IN RE: Bair Hugger Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-2666 - IN RE: Bair Hugger Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation
April 29, 2016
PDF | More
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 5: Direct Filing. Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on April 29, 2016. (CBC)
July 8, 2016
PDF | More
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 12: Computer Assisted Review Protocol. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on July 8, 2016. (CBC)
September 27, 2016
PDF | More
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 14: Plaintiff Fact Sheet and Service Protocol. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on September 27, 2016. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A - Plaintiff Fact Sheet, # (2) Exhibit B - Plaintiff Fact Sheet Medical Form.(CBC)
November 16, 2016
PDF | More
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 15: Bellwether Trial Selection Process. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on November 16, 2016. (CBC)
April 13, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER: Plaintiffs' objection to the magistrate judge's Order [Dkt. No. 279] is DENIED. The magistrate judge's Order of March 6, 2017 [Dkt. No. 249] is AFFIRMED. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on April 13, 2017. (CBC)
July 24, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER: (1) Defendant 3M Company's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Comply with Pretrial Order No. 14 (Motion) [Dkt. No. 590] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as stated below. (2) The following cases are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: Nos. 16-cv-4360 (Spaich, et al. v. 3M Co., et al.) and 16-cv-2936 (Bryson v. 3M Co., et al.). (3) The Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to No. 16-cv-1986 (Harkleroad v. 3M Co., et al.), consistent with the opinion. (4) The Motion is DENIED AS MOOT as to No. 16-cv-4381 (Manzanares v. 3M Co., et al.). (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on July 24, 2017. (CBC)
August 25, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER: (1) Defendants 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Comply with Pretrial Order No. 14 (Motion) [Dkt. No. 637] was GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART and STAYED IN PART as stated below. (2) The Motion o 16-cv-1847 (Rivers v. 3M Co., et al.) and 16-cv-2374 (Upton v. 3M Co., et al.). (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on August 25, 2017. (CBC)was DENIED as moot as to 16-cv-2787 (Hood, et al. v. 3M Co., et al.). (3) The Motion was DENIED without prejudice to renew as to 16-cv-2212 (Pettersen v. 3M Co., et al.) and 16-cv-2750 (Brannon v. 3M Co., et al.). (4) The following cases were DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: Nos. 16-cv-826 (Starnes v. 3M Co., et al.), 16-cv-1338 (Hartzel v. 3M Co., et al.), 16-cv-1834 (Newcomb v. 3M Co., et al.), 16-cv-1847 (Rivers v. 3M Co., et al.), 16-cv-2156 (Busby v. 3M Co., et al.), 16-cv-2374 (Upton v. 3M Co., et al.), 16-cv-2395 (Nadeau v. 3M Co., et al.), 16-cv-2661 (Davis v. 3M Co., et al.), 16-cv-2711 (Miller, et al. v. 3M Co., et al.), 16-cv-2959 (Novak v. 3M Co., et al.), 16-cv-4353 (Butkus v. 3M Co., et al.), 16-cv-4412 (Gill v. 3M Co., et al.), 16-cv-4418 (Burks v. 3M Co., et al.), 17-cv-188 (Stouffer v. 3M Co., et al.), 17-cv-299 (Raymond v. 3M Co., et al.), 17-cv-350 (Sanders v. 3M Co., et al.) and 17-cv-597 (Perez v. 3M Co., et al.). (5) This Order was STAYED until August 31, 2017 as t
December 13, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER: (1) Plaintiffs' Motion as to Hannenberg [Dkt. No. 727] is DENIED, (2) Plaintiffs' Motion as to Ho [Dkt. No. 733] is DENIED, (3) Plaintiffs' Motion as to Keen [Dkt. No. 738] is DENIED, (4) Plaintiffs' Motion as to Lampotang [Dkt. No. 743] is DENIED, (5) Defendants' Motion as to Samet, Jarvis and Stonnington [Dkt. No. 745] is DENIED, (6) Plaintiffs' Motion as to Ulatowski [Dkt. No. 755] is DENIED, (7) Defendants' Motion as to David's regulatory opinions [Dkt. No. 758] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, (8) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 759] is DENIED, (9) Plaintiffs' Motion as to Borak [Dkt. No. 778] is DENIED, (10) Plaintiffs' Motion as to Kuehn [Dkt. No. 787] is DENIED, (11) Defendants' Motion as to Koenigshofer, Buck, Elghobashi, and David's engineering opinions [Dkt. No. 794] is DENIED, (12) Plaintiffs' Motion as to Mont [Dkt. No. 796] is DENIED, (13) Plaintiffs' Motion as to Holford [Dkt. No. 801] is DENIED, (14) Plaintiffs' Motion as to Wenzel [Dkt. No. 812] is DENIED, (15) Plaintiffs' Motion as to Abraham [Dkt. No. 821] is DENIED, (16) Plaintiffs' Motion as to Hughes [Dkt. No. 826] is DENIED and (17) Plaintiffs' Motion as to Settles [Dkt. No. 832] is DENIED. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on December 13, 2017. (CBC) (cc: Colby) Modified on 12/14/2017 (AKL).
January 19, 2018
PDF | More
rakis v. 3M Co., et al.), 17-cv-1879 (Sellers v. 3M Co., et al.), 17-cv-2738 (Allen v. 3M Co., et al.), 17-cv-2747 (Graves v. 3M Co., et al.), 17-cv-2763 (Maxheimer v. 3M Co., et al.) and 17-cv-2892 (Saylor v. 3M Co., et al.). (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on January 19, 2018. (CBC)ORDER: (1) Defendants 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Comply with Pretrial Order No. 14 (Motion) [Dkt. No. 1030] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as below. (2) The Motion is DENIED as moot as to 17-cv-2755 (Morris v. 3M Co., et al.) and 17-cv-3038 (Schapansky v. 3M Co., et al.). (3) The Motion is DENIED without prejudice to renew as to 17-cv-998 (Gruetzmacher v. 3M Co., et al.), 17-cv-1017 (Maria Garcia v. 3M Co., et al.) and 17-cv-2881 (Prince v. 3M Company). (4) The following cases are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because the Motion is GRANTED as to 17-cv-343 (Grooms v. 3M Co., et al.), 17-cv-640 (Johnson v. 3M Co., et al.), 17-cv-711 (Gilbert Garcia v. 3M Co., et al.), 17-cv-1082 (Pet
February 15, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER: (1) Defendants 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Comply with Pretrial Order No. 14 (Motion) [Dkt. No. 1068] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as below. (2) The following cases are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because the Motion is GRANTED as to them: 17-cv-998 (Gruetzmacher v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-1017 (Garcia v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-1139 (Husman v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-1215 (Pickens v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-1250 (Sparks v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-1323 (Peters v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-1407 (Jadwin v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-2099 (Osborne v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-2231 (Nunn v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-2383 (Blancett v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-2415 (Pickett v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-2589 (Rashad v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-2726 (McCall v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3103 (Ghidella v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3187 (Gawthorp v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3233 (McLaughlin v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3819 (Mazer v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3823 (Miller v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3895 (Loving v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3948 (Gilliam v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3954 (Rietz v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3956 (Reeves v. 3M Co.) and 17-cv-4094 (OConnell v. 3M Co.). (3) For lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, the following cases are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: 17-cv-2319 (Taylor v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-2452 (Suchan v. 3M Co.) and 17-cv-4177 (Butler v. 3M Co.). The Motion is DENIED as moot as to these cases. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on 2/15/2018. (CBC)
March 12, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER: (1) Defendants 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Comply with Pretrial Order No. 14 ("Motion") [Dkt. No. 1124] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as below. (2) The following nine cases are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because the Motion is GRANTED as to them: 17-cv-1978 (Strain v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-2581 (Key v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-2919 (Campbell v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3445 (Quinan v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3666 (Gallo v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3721 (Ramirez v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-4500 (Hammel-Fogleboch v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-4515 (Horn v. 3M Co.) and 17-cv-4519 (Williams v. 3M Co.). (3) The Motion is DENIED without prejudice to renew as to 17-cv-2372 (Hufford v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3834 (Thornton v. 3M Co.) and 17-cv-4431 (Slaughter v. 3M Co.). (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on 3/12/2018. (CBC)
May 9, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER denying 1227 Motion to Reconsider re 924 Redacted Document filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 866 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 879 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 940 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 929 Redacted Document filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 905 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 918 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 944 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 881 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 903 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 803 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 942 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 948 Redacted Document filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 943 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 938 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 868 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 887 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 895 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 789 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 780 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 921 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 900 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 891 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 883 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 901 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 925 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 915 Redacted Document filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 945 Exhibit filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel, 935 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Plaintiff's Co-Lead Counsel (Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel on 5/8/2018. (TMA)
June 18, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER re Defendants' 1258 Objection to Order Disposing of Motion for Further Consideration of Sealing and Plaintiffs' 1259 APPEAL/OBJECTION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Judge. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on 6/18/2018. (CBC)
June 20, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motion [Dkt. No. 1272] to dismiss member cases under Pretrial Order No. 14 and granting in part Defendants' Motion [Dkt. No. 1283] to dismiss member cases for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on 6/20/2018. (CBC)