Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-954 - Shields et al v. General Mills, Inc.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-954 - Shields et al v. General Mills, Inc.
December 1, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommends 1. General Mills, Inc.'s Motion to Disqualify Counsel (ECF No. 70) should be DENIED. 2. Snyder & Brandt shall maintain the currently established ethical wall precluding their participation in Ms. Maxe's individual representation. 3. Nichols Kaster shall maintain the currently established ethical wall precluding their participation in Mr. Heflins individual representation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 12/1/17. (LPH)
December 20, 2017
PDF | More
Opinion) Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 12/20/17. (KMW)ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 101 Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. General Mills, Inc.'s Motion to Disqualify Counsel 70 should be DENIED. 2. Snyder & Brandt shall maintain the currently established ethical wall precluding their participation in Ms. Maxe's individual representation. 3. Nichols Kaster shall maintain the currently established ethical wall precluding their participation in Mr. Heflin's individual representation.(Written
January 2, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant General Mill's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint and to Compel Arbitration on an Individual Basis 43 is GRANTED in part as follows: Count 1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, Counts 2 through 5 as they related to the Settled Plaintiffs are STAYED pending arbitration, Count 9 is dismissed with prejudice and the motion to dismiss or amend Counts 6 through 8 (Plaintiff Kloeckner's Individual Claims) is DENIED. 2. All Plaintiffs except Linda Kloeckner may submit their claims to arbitration on an individual basis only. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 1/2/18. (GRR)
January 26, 2018
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommends 109 MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION - Expedited Handling Requested filed by Plaintiffs, be denied. The Court, having found no basis to grant the relief sought by the plaintiffs, is expressly declining to enjoin or postpone in any way the arbitration scheduled for January 29, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 1/26/18. (LPH)
February 14, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 121 Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction 109 is DENIED. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 2/13/2018. (KMW)