United States Government Publishing Office
publisher
pbl
distributor
dst
United States
United States District Court District of Minnesota
author
aut
Government Organization
text
government publication
eng
USCOURTS
Judicial Publications
judicial
2018-02-15
Administrative Office of the United States Courts
2018-02-14
monographic
deposited
born digital
JU 4.15
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954
P0b002ee198770643
DGPO
2018-02-15
2018-02-15
USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954
machine generated
eng
fdlp
USCOURTS
USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954
District
mnd
8th
Minnesota
2260
0:16-cv-00954
DMN
civil
442
Civil Rights Employment
29:621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Shields et al v. General Mills, Inc.
0:16-cv-00954
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954
JU 4.15
0:16-cv-00954;16-954
United States District Court District of Minnesota
8th Circuit
DMN
U.S. Courts
author
aut
AARP
AARP
Amicus
AARP Foundation
AARP Foundation
Amicus
Ann Albertson
Albertson
Ann
Plaintiff
Michael Allard
Allard
Michael
Plaintiff
Ami Anderson
Anderson
Ami
Plaintiff
Carol Andraschko
Andraschko
Carol
Plaintiff
Jerry Bemrich
Bemrich
Jerry
Plaintiff
Donald Blue
Blue
Donald
Plaintiff
Laurie Bluhm
Bluhm
Laurie
Plaintiff
Jim Buccellato
Buccellato
Jim
Plaintiff
Jeffrey Carter
Carter
Jeffrey
Plaintiff
Kimberly Christ
Christ
Kimberly
Plaintiff
Carolyn Cooper
Cooper
Carolyn
Plaintiff
Karen Cope
Cope
Karen
Plaintiff
Julie Dahly
Dahly
Julie
Plaintiff
Gordon Deeds
Deeds
Gordon
Plaintiff
Michael Dickman
Dickman
Michael
Plaintiff
Cynthia Drantch
Drantch
Cynthia
Plaintiff
Janet Ehlers
Ehlers
Janet
Plaintiff
Paul Fazio
Fazio
Paul
Plaintiff
Robin Feenie
Feenie
Robin
Plaintiff
Bruce Fiedler
Fiedler
Bruce
Plaintiff
Jacki Filippi
Filippi
Jacki
Plaintiff
James Flanigan
Flanigan
James
Plaintiff
Julie Fleischhacker
Fleischhacker
Julie
Plaintiff
Jeff Funaro
Funaro
Jeff
Plaintiff
General Mills, Inc.
General Mills, Inc.
Defendant
Karen Guerrieri
Guerrieri
Karen
Plaintiff
Kimberly Haas
Haas
Kimberly
Plaintiff
Laura Hapsch
Hapsch
Laura
Plaintiff
James Heflin
Heflin
James
Plaintiff
Denise Holtz
Holtz
Denise
Plaintiff
Mark Iorio
Iorio
Mark
Plaintiff
Susan Hayes Jacobson
Jacobson
Susan
Plaintiff
Nancy Karls
Karls
Nancy
Plaintiff
Denise Klaverkamp
Klaverkamp
Denise
Plaintiff
Carol Kline
Kline
Carol
Plaintiff
Linda Kloeckner
Kloeckner
Linda
Plaintiff
Peter Kokemueller
Kokemueller
Peter
Plaintiff
James Levi
Levi
James
Plaintiff
Matthew Lorence
Lorence
Matthew
Plaintiff
Ivan Martinez
Martinez
Ivan
Plaintiff
Rick Marvig
Marvig
Rick
Plaintiff
Cheryl Mason
Mason
Cheryl
Plaintiff
Ruth Meger
Meger
Ruth
Plaintiff
Paige Miller
Miller
Paige
Plaintiff
Behroze Mistry
Mistry
Behroze
Plaintiff
Elizabeth Mitchell
Mitchell
Elizabeth
Plaintiff
Michelle Motto
Motto
Michelle
Plaintiff
Chris Muntifering
Muntifering
Chris
Plaintiff
Michael Murray
Murray
Michael
Plaintiff
Sharon Narog
Narog
Sharon
Plaintiff
Charles Nix
Nix
Charles
Plaintiff
Cheryl O'Fallon
O'Fallon
Cheryl
Plaintiff
Annette Olson
Olson
Annette
Plaintiff
Theresa Panchyshyn
Panchyshyn
Theresa
Plaintiff
Janet Polakiewicz
Polakiewicz
Janet
Plaintiff
Jeff Price
Price
Jeff
Plaintiff
Joseph Rastetter
Rastetter
Joseph
Plaintiff
Karen Reger
Reger
Karen
Plaintiff
Sean Roberts
Roberts
Sean
Plaintiff
William Shields
Shields
William
Plaintiff
Linda Wentzlaff
Wentzlaff
Linda
Plaintiff
Juanda White
White
Juanda
Plaintiff
John Williams
Williams
John
Plaintiff
USCOURTS
USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954
District
mnd
8th
Minnesota
2260
0:16-cv-00954
DMN
civil
442
Civil Rights Employment
29:621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Minnesota
Shields et al v. General Mills, Inc.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommends 1. General Mills, Inc.'s Motion to Disqualify Counsel (ECF No. 70) should be DENIED. 2. Snyder & Brandt shall maintain the currently established ethical wall precluding their participation in Ms. Maxe's individual representation. 3. Nichols Kaster shall maintain the currently established ethical wall precluding their participation in Mr. Heflins individual representation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 12/1/17. (LPH)
0
2017-12-01
D09002ee19877ca63
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954-0
mnd-0_16-cv-00954_0.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954-0
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954/pdf/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954-0.pdf
USCOURTS 0:16-cv-00954; Shields et al v. General Mills, Inc.;
United States District Court District of Minnesota
Minnesota
USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954-0
0
2017-12-01
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommends 1. General Mills, Inc.'s Motion to Disqualify Counsel (ECF No. 70) should be DENIED. 2. Snyder & Brandt shall maintain the currently established ethical wall precluding their participation in Ms. Maxe's individual representation. 3. Nichols Kaster shall maintain the currently established ethical wall precluding their participation in Mr. Heflins individual representation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 12/1/17. (LPH)
Shields et al v. General Mills, Inc.
Opinion) Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 12/20/17. (KMW)ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 101 Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. General Mills, Inc.'s Motion to Disqualify Counsel 70 should be DENIED. 2. Snyder & Brandt shall maintain the currently established ethical wall precluding their participation in Ms. Maxe's individual representation. 3. Nichols Kaster shall maintain the currently established ethical wall precluding their participation in Mr. Heflin's individual representation.(Written
1
2017-12-20
D09002ee19877ca5f
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954-1
mnd-0_16-cv-00954_1.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954-1
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954/pdf/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954-1.pdf
USCOURTS 0:16-cv-00954; Shields et al v. General Mills, Inc.;
United States District Court District of Minnesota
Minnesota
USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954-1
1
2017-12-20
Opinion) Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 12/20/17. (KMW)ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 101 Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. General Mills, Inc.'s Motion to Disqualify Counsel 70 should be DENIED. 2. Snyder & Brandt shall maintain the currently established ethical wall precluding their participation in Ms. Maxe's individual representation. 3. Nichols Kaster shall maintain the currently established ethical wall precluding their participation in Mr. Heflin's individual representation.(Written
Shields et al v. General Mills, Inc.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant General Mill's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint and to Compel Arbitration on an Individual Basis 43 is GRANTED in part as follows: Count 1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, Counts 2 through 5 as they related to the Settled Plaintiffs are STAYED pending arbitration, Count 9 is dismissed with prejudice and the motion to dismiss or amend Counts 6 through 8 (Plaintiff Kloeckner's Individual Claims) is DENIED. 2. All Plaintiffs except Linda Kloeckner may submit their claims to arbitration on an individual basis only. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 1/2/18. (GRR)
2
2018-01-02
D09002ee19877ca60
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954-2
mnd-0_16-cv-00954_2.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954-2
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954/pdf/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954-2.pdf
USCOURTS 0:16-cv-00954; Shields et al v. General Mills, Inc.;
United States District Court District of Minnesota
Minnesota
USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954-2
2
2018-01-02
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant General Mill's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint and to Compel Arbitration on an Individual Basis 43 is GRANTED in part as follows: Count 1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, Counts 2 through 5 as they related to the Settled Plaintiffs are STAYED pending arbitration, Count 9 is dismissed with prejudice and the motion to dismiss or amend Counts 6 through 8 (Plaintiff Kloeckner's Individual Claims) is DENIED. 2. All Plaintiffs except Linda Kloeckner may submit their claims to arbitration on an individual basis only. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 1/2/18. (GRR)
Shields et al v. General Mills, Inc.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommends 109 MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION - Expedited Handling Requested filed by Plaintiffs, be denied. The Court, having found no basis to grant the relief sought by the plaintiffs, is expressly declining to enjoin or postpone in any way the arbitration scheduled for January 29, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 1/26/18. (LPH)
3
2018-01-26
D09002ee19877ca61
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954-3
mnd-0_16-cv-00954_3.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954-3
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954/pdf/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954-3.pdf
USCOURTS 0:16-cv-00954; Shields et al v. General Mills, Inc.;
United States District Court District of Minnesota
Minnesota
USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954-3
3
2018-01-26
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommends 109 MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION - Expedited Handling Requested filed by Plaintiffs, be denied. The Court, having found no basis to grant the relief sought by the plaintiffs, is expressly declining to enjoin or postpone in any way the arbitration scheduled for January 29, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 1/26/18. (LPH)
Shields et al v. General Mills, Inc.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 121 Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction 109 is DENIED. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 2/13/2018. (KMW)
4
2018-02-14
D09002ee19877ca62
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954-4
mnd-0_16-cv-00954_4.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954-4
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954/pdf/USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954-4.pdf
USCOURTS 0:16-cv-00954; Shields et al v. General Mills, Inc.;
United States District Court District of Minnesota
Minnesota
USCOURTS-mnd-0_16-cv-00954-4
4
2018-02-14
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 121 Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction 109 is DENIED. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 2/13/2018. (KMW)