Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-1220 - Hudock et al v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-1220 - Hudock et al v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. et al
March 27, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. 1) Granting in part and denying in part defendant LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.'s 18 Motion to Dismiss. (a) The motion is GRANTED with respect to the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act [Count IV]. Count IV is DISMISSED without prejudice. (b) The motion is GRANTED with respect to the breach of contract claim [Count VIII]. Count VIII is DISMISSED with prejudice. (c) The motion is DENIED in all other respects. 2) Granting in part and denying in part Best Buy Co., Best Buy Stores, L.P., and BestBuy.com, LLC's 22 Motion to Dismiss. (a)The motion is GRANTED in its entirety with respect to the claims against Best Buy Co., Inc. and Best Buy Stores, L.P. Best Buy Co., Inc. and Best Buy Stores, L.P. are DISMISSED without prejudice from this case. (b) The motion is GRANTED with respect to the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act claim [Count IV] against BestBuy.com. Count IV is DISMISSED without prejudice. (c) The motion is DENIED in all other respects. (Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on March 27, 2017. (DML)
January 30, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' PARTIAL MOTIONS TO DISMISS: Defendant LG's Partial Motion to Dismiss First Amended Class Action Complaint 65 is DENIED; Defendant Best Buy's Partial Motion to Dismiss First Amended Class Action Complaint 70 is DENIED.(Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 01/30/2018. (JMK)