Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-2452 - Suchan v. 3M Company et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-2452 - Suchan v. 3M Company et al
February 15, 2018
PDF | More
H PREJUDICE because the Motion is GRANTED as to them: 17-cv-998 (Gruetzmacher v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-1017 (Garcia v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-1139 (Husman v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-1215 (Pickens v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-1250 (Sparks v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-1323 (Peters v. 3M Co.), 17-cORDER: (1) Defendants 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Comply with Pretrial Order No. 14 (Motion) [Dkt. No. 1068] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as below. (2) The following cases are DISMISSED WITv-1407 (Jadwin v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-2099 (Osborne v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-2231 (Nunn v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-2383 (Blancett v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-2415 (Pickett v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-2589 (Rashad v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-2726 (McCall v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3103 (Ghidella v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3187 (Gawthorp v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3233 (McLaughlin v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3819 (Mazer v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3823 (Miller v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3895 (Loving v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3948 (Gilliam v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3954 (Rietz v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-3956 (Reeves v. 3M Co.) and 17-cv-4094 (OConnell v. 3M Co.). (3) For lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, the following cases are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: 17-cv-2319 (Taylor v. 3M Co.), 17-cv-2452 (Suchan v. 3M Co.) and 17-cv-4177 (Butler v. 3M Co.). The Motion is DENIED as moot as to these cases. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on 2/15/2018. (CBC)