Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-5166 - Oates v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-5166 - Oates v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
January 30, 2018
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommends that 3 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Lovell N. Oates be DENIED, 12 MOTION for a Summons filed by Lovell N. Oates be DENIED, 10 MOTION for an Appeal and for an Attorney be DENIED, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction, 9 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Lovell N. Oates be DENIED, 15 MOTION for Judicial Notice of fact to be placed on the record be DENIED AS MOOT, 11 MOTION for Amendement be DENIED, No certificate of appealability be issued. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 1/30/2018. cc: Oates (ACH)
February 14, 2018
PDF | More
tificate of Appealability will issue. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion) Signed by The Hon. Paul A. Magnuson on 2/14/2018. (LLM) (cc: Oates) Modified on 2/15/2018 (AKL). Modified on 2/15/2018 (AKL).rma pauperis 3 is DENIED; 3. The Motions for Appointment of Counsel 9 10 are DENIED; 4. The Motion for Amendment 11 is DENIED; 5. The Motion for a Summons 12 is DENIED; 6. The Motion for Judicial Notice 15 is DENIED as moot; and 7. No CerDOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR-WILL REFILE-ORDER: The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge 17 is hereby ADOPTED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction; 2. The Application to proceed in fo