Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-107 - Luster v. USA


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-107 - Luster v. USA
May 17, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM: For the reasons discussed above, the Court concludes that Luster is not entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C. 2255 based on the claim he asserts in the supplemental motion to vacate. Therefore, the motion will be denied without a hearing. See Engelen v. United States, 68 F.3d 238, 240 (8th Cir. 1995). Additionally, the Court finds that Luster has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Therefore, no certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 2253. An order consistent with this memorandum opinion will be filed separately. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 5/17/2017. (JMC)
May 18, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM: For the reasons discussed above, the Court concludes that Luster is not entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 based on the claim he asserts in the motion to vacate. Therefore, the motion will be denied without a hearing. See Engelen v. United States, 68 F.3d 238, 240 (8th Cir. 1995). Additionally, the Court finds that Luster has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Therefore, no certificate of appealability will be issued. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 5/18/2017. (JMC)