Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

07-1339 - American Log Homes, Inc. v. Bosse, et al.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
07-1339 - American Log Homes, Inc. v. Bosse, et al.
October 24, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of Defendants Darrel J. Bosse and Susan M. Bosse for leave to file a joint amended answer to the complaint is GRANTED 22. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to strike the separate answers of these Defendants, or in the alternative to deem certain allegations admitted, is DENIED as moot, in light of the above ruling 13. Signed by Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 10/24/07. (TRC)
August 5, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER RELATED TO DISCOVERY re 51 60 49Following a hearing on the record on August 1, 2008, related to discovery matters, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, Defendants having no objection thereto, that Plaintiff's motion (Doc. #51) for a protective order filed on June 20, 2008, is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motion to compel discovery (Doc. #49) is substantially GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to compel discovery (Doc. #60) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as set forth at the hearing. FURTHER ORDERED, inasmuch as Defendants are asserting that records responsive to Plaintiff's request were on a personal computer whose data was lost or destroyed, that Defendants shall promptly disclose to Plaintiff: (see order for details) Signed by Mag Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 8/5/08. (CEL)
August 8, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for a Protective Order is granted, in accordance with the terms of the Protective Order submitted by the parties 79. Signed by Mag Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 8/8/08. (TRC)
September 2, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER re 73 81 : ORDERED that Defendants' objections (Doc. # 81) toPlaintiff's proposed testimony by Richard Hollenstine are overruled. In documents #73 and #74 Plaintiff has substantially complied with this Court's Memorandum and Order dated August 5, 2008, and has sufficiently identified the areas and substance of Mr. Hollenstine's proposed testimony for the Court to determine that the proposed testimony arose out of Mr. Hollenstine's prior services as an accountant for Plaintiff, and that an expert report under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) is not required. Defendants may obtain additional information regarding the proposed testimony by taking Mr. Hollenstines deposition.. Signed by Mag Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 9/2/08. (CEL)
December 18, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re:110 ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment on Count I of Plaintiff's complaint is DENIED. [Doc. #110].. Signed by Mag Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 12/18/08. (CEL)