Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-239 - Jones v. Sachse, et al.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-239 - Jones v. Sachse, et al.
February 2, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.) filed by Alfred Lee Jones. The petition should be denied because grounds two and four are procedurally barred and grounds one, three, and five lack merit. Accordingly, after careful consideration, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 petition of Alfred Jones be DENIED without further proceedings. The parties are advised that they have fourteen days to file written objections to this Recommendation and the Memorandum incorporated herein, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1), unless an extension of time for good cause is obtained; and that failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. Objections to R&R due by 2/16/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on February 2, 2016. (MCB)
March 31, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation filed on February 2, 2016 38 is adopted and sustained in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners objections to the Report and Recommendation 39 are overruled. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. A separate judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 3/31/16. (CAR)