Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-323 - Huggans v. United States of America


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-323 - Huggans v. United States of America
June 12, 2015
PDF | More
Catherine D. Perry on 06/12/2015. (CBL)MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Darwin Markeith Huggans's motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [#1] is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court will not issue a certificate of appealability, as Huggans has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right. A separate Judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date. Signed by District Judge
July 26, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to alter or amend judgment and supplemental motions [23, 32], motions for discovery [24, 28], motion for appointment of counsel 29, and all related supplements are denied. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on July 26, 2016. (MCB)
October 4, 2016
PDF | More
e $505 appellate filing fee or file a motion in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Huggans shall file any future documents or pleadings in connection with his appeal directly with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 10/4/2016. (NEB)MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Darwin Markeith Huggans' motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [47] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Huggans shall, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, either pay th
February 9, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Darwin Markeith Huggans motion to alter or amend judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) 54 is DENIED. An appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith given that, for the reasons set out above, Huggans has failed to present argument or evidence showing that his claim has any arguable basis either in law or fact. 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3); Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 2/9/2018. (CBL)