Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-810 - Traditionalist American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan et al v. Desloge, City of, Missouri


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-810 - Traditionalist American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan et al v. Desloge, City of, Missouri
August 22, 2013
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Continue is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction is RESET to Wednesday, September 11, 2013 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9 North in the Thomas F. Eagleton Courthouse. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file their reply brief no later than August 29, 2013. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall file its sur-reply no later than September 5, 2013. In Court Hearing set for 9/11/2013 11:00 AM in Courtroom 9N before Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 8/22/13. (CEL)
February 23, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. [Doc. 73.] The motion is GRANTED with respect to Counts I and II of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint. The motion is DENIED with respect to Count III. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Counts I and II of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint are dismissed as moot. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that a Rule 16 Conference is set on Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. in the chambers of the undersigned. An order setting forth the Rule 16 will accompany this Memorandum and Order.[Doc. 75.] 73 75 Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 2/23/16. (CLA)
September 21, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss is GRANTED. [Doc. 110.] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiffs refile this action, Plaintiffs must pay Defendants court costs, less any expenses for work that can be reused, and that evidence admitted at the preliminary injunction hearing will be admissible to the same extent in any refiled action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by agreement of Plaintiffs, the Court will impose the following conditions: 1. Any refiled action will be filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri; 2. Any amendments to the solicitation provisions of the ordinance to bring it in line with Reed v. Town of Gilbert, Arizona, 135 S. Ct. 2218, 192 L. Ed. 2d 236 (2015), will not trigger refilling; and 3. Any facial challenge to the ordinance must be refiled no later than December 19, 2017, at which point this dismissal shall convert into a dismissal with prejudice with respect to a facial challenge. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 110 Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 9/21/16. (CLA)