Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-2500 - Smith v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis Pension Plan for Nonschedule Employees


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-2500 - Smith v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis Pension Plan for Nonschedule Employees
September 11, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF STAY: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 14 is denied without prejudice to being refiled as set out above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is stayed pending further Order of the Court, and the parties shall notify me of decisions issued in the two cases discussed above by filing a joint memorandum attaching a copy of the decision within 10 days of its issuance. Within 10 days of the last decision being issued, the parties shall file a joint motion to lift the stay and propose new briefing and/or scheduling deadlines, if required.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 9/11/14. (LGK)
July 22, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF STAY: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this case is stayed pending further Order of the Court, and the parties shall notify me of the decision issued by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in the appeal of Ingram v. Terminal Railroad Assoc. of St. Louis Pension Plan, Case No. 4:11 CV 1327 HEA, by filing a joint memorandum attaching a copy of the decision within 10 days of its issuance. Within 10 days of the mandate being issued in that case, the parties shall file a joint motion to lift the stay and propose new briefing and/or scheduling deadlines, if required. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 7/22/15. (ARL)
March 29, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, by no later than April 4, 2016, the parties shall file a joint memorandum advising me of the status of this case and whether a new briefing schedule is required in light of the decisions from the Seventh and Eighth Circuit Courts of Appeal. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions against one or both parties. Response to Court due by 4/4/2016. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 3/29/16. (CAR)