Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

14-1357 - White v. Wallace

Download Files


Document in Context
14-1357 - White v. Wallace
April 17, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons discussed above, the Court concludes that petitioner has failed to establish that he is entitled to relief based on state court proceedings that were contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, or based upon an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceedings. 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254(d). Petitioner has also failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Therefore, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997). A judgment in accordance with this Memorandum will be entered separately. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 4/17/2017. (CLO)
June 2, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner motion for extension of time [#31] is denied. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 6/2/17. (JAB)