Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-1765 - Wunderli v. United States of America


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-1765 - Wunderli v. United States of America
October 28, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's motion for appointment of counsel Doc. #3 is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 10/28/14. (ARL)
August 31, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion For Request Documents [sic] and Additional Time and Legal Counsel 19 is GRANTED in part. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Petitioner a copy of the documents he has requested from the criminal case, 4:11CR538JAR. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is granted leave to file a supplement to hissection 2255 petition within sixty (60) days from the date of this order.IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Petitioner's request for appointment of counsel isDENIED without prejudice. ( Response to Court due by 10/30/2015.) Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 8/31/15. (Note: Clerk's Office has provided Petitioner copies requested. Placed in US Mail this date.)(ARL)
March 27, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Movant Mark Wunderli's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 (Doc. 1) is DENIED. FURTHER the Court finds that, because Movant cannot make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 834 (1998). A judgment dismissing this case is filed herewith. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 3/27/2018. (CLO)